Dead Body adjacent Crashed Disk on Moon

Those are pretty impressive close-ups. The only problem I see is that there are hundreds of similar dome shaped objects right next to the one you point out. It would be very disturbing to believe that those are ALL ufo objects buried underneath the immediate surface.

Originally posted by blowfishdl
Those are pretty impressive close-ups. The only problem I see is that there are hundreds of similar dome shaped objects right next to the one you point out. It would be very disturbing to believe that those are ALL ufo objects buried underneath the immediate surface.

It isn't a close up. It's from many kilometers above. It's hard to get a sense of scale without an atmosphere, since things don't fade and lose contrast as they get further away.

Anyway, this thread is pretty hilarious. I don't think I could make up anything inane and bizarre enough that I couldn't get ten people from ATS to believe wholeheartedly.

If dirt, ricks, shadows, reflections, and boobs are what you see? That's great.

Subject matter can be difficult for some. for the latter, I guess it takes one to know one?

reply to post by operation mindcrime


Yours are pretty sorry ass, flippant, and sarcastic. If you think you have a real one let’s see it?

reply to post by nnelsosj


From my readings are various posts like these around this site, it seems people forget one of the most fundamental aspects of the human mind -- that we have a fantastic ability to see 'patterns' in everyday objects in order to make sense of reality. We like order, we like consistency, social conformity, etc. We don't like randomness or the idea that things happen without a reason.

And this points to just that -- you see something because, well, you want to. I honestly cannot see how you can reasonably assume there is a "disc" or "body" in that image based on the fairly low res quality of the image.

Also, where you mention that you see a round object on the 'body' and circle it - there's a very *high* probability that has to do with the imaging capabilities of the camera/lens taking the image and how that image is represented by the imaging algorithms of the software.

Sorry, but I think it's a monster reach of a supposition that there's a disc and body in this image...

Whilst i am a fan of the concept of moon artifacts,
i dont really see anything un natural in these photos...

there are much more convincing cases out there.

reply to post by nnelsosj


"Nurse!, nurse!, Mr Nnelsos is ready for his five O'clock treatment and medicine!!"

Man, I hope you're purposefully taking the p**s with this?

Someone please explain to me how a crashed disk and a body can be seen from either orbital pictures or telescopic photos?????

I mean, I had some saki tonight, but not *that* much. Yet.

Ok, at first look I could not see anything apart from a few rocks and shadows. I looked again a few times and noticed something like a head but to me... I think it is just a bunch of rocks and dust and trick of light. Dont get me wrong, I do believe there are structures and bases on the moon, and that E.T's do exist but in my opinion there is nothing in these photo's other then rocks, dirt and shadows. Sorry.

I have always wondered what kind of mindset people must have to see things that are obviously not there.

[edit on 15-12-2008 by riggs2099]

[edit on 15-12-2008 by riggs2099]

There is nothing there. You are delusional.

Scientists wonder if Extra-Terrestrials would ever visit earth because we are such a measly and useless planet. The moon?