Iran Said to Have Enough Nuclear Fuel for One Weapon

Iran is no threat. The only threat that exists is the created one by the war mongers in Washington. Why would they use a nuke when they know if they did they would be flattened in 15 minutes. I noticed how fast Foxnews picked this up. No surprises there. In fact look at the propaganda they sling





heh quite funny.


[edit on 20-11-2008 by mybigunit]

True or not true. All this article is saying: BOMB IRAN NOW!

[edit on 20-11-2008 by Benarius]

Originally posted by Agit8dChop

4. Israel and the US Will think again before invading/occupying an arab
nation

Yo, expert on all these issues ...

Iran does not consider itself to be an "arab nation". It pisses them off to be called that. They call themselves persians.

Still, IMO neither arabs or persians should have nuclear weapons.

Originally posted by centurion1211

Originally posted by Agit8dChop

4. Israel and the US Will think again before invading/occupying an arab
nation

Yo, expert on all these issues ...

Iran does not consider itself to be an "arab nation". It pisses them off to be called that. They call themselves persians.

Still, IMO neither arabs or persians should have nuclear weapons.

Why in your oppinion should America and other nations have them?

Originally posted by centurion1211

Originally posted by Agit8dChop

Still, IMO neither arabs or persians should have nuclear weapons.

How long will they be stopped from getting nuclear weapons?

IF a developing rugged nation like Pakistan can have more than 100 nuclear warheads in its arsenal than so can Arabs and Persians.

Pakistan has a long history of links with terrorism compare to Arab and persian nations.

Originally posted by mybigunit

Fox has just cemented Ahmedinejad's success in the upcoming Iranian elections!

Personally I dont think a nuclear armed Iran is a major issue. If anything, it would aid in the stability of the region. Iranians have a great distaste for Arabs, so a nuclear Iran would balance against the conventionally strong Saudi Arabia (supplied with US hardware).

Pakistan is far more concerning. Obama is correct on this issue... coalition troops out of Iraq and into the Afghan-Pakistani border regions. If those militants in Waziristan aren't destroyed, Pakistan risks losing control of its arsenal. That would be doomsday.

Originally posted by 44soulslayer

Fox has just cemented Ahmedinejad's success in the upcoming Iranian elections!

Personally I dont think a nuclear armed Iran is a major issue. If anything, it would aid in the stability of the region. Iranians have a great distaste for Arabs, so a nuclear Iran would balance against the conventionally strong Saudi Arabia (supplied with US hardware).

Pakistan is far more concerning. Obama is correct on this issue... coalition troops out of Iraq and into the Afghan-Pakistani border regions. If those militants in Waziristan aren't destroyed, Pakistan risks losing control of its arsenal. That would be doomsday.

Correct. I mean think of where the terrorists are. They arent coming out of Iran they are coming from places like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. I too dont see a big deal. Israel has nukes. The fact is Iran has oil and the PTB want that oil. On top of that Iran isnt conforming to the one world government that they want. They choose not to live the ultra liberal lifestyle that we choose to live. Who are we to tell them how to live but with oil and a non conformation that puts a big bullseye on their back. Sigh....

Iran is ALLOWED to produce uranium enriched for its own nuclear reactor - thats what signing the NPT means;

so why the sensationalist headlines? - the reactor is ready to roll - and is the second they have anyway ; the first was built by the USA in the 1950`s , is still in use and is in Tehran.


so what would happen if someone attacked a fully running reactor then.... thats right the ME would be contaminated by the nastiest things imaginable - chernobyl gives an idea of the crap from a reactor

Here is an excellent link on how Israel percieves the Iran nuclear bomb threat and how it has measures in place to measure, plan and mitigate the Iran risk

The Israel Project

Originally posted by sunny_2008nywe have to accept the fact that Iran has a nuclear bomb.

Yeah, if they decide to further refine the fuel to weapon's grade. Which would take another 8-10 years with the equipment they have. This is backed up by our own intelligence, and news released by front (public facing) organizations like the CIA.


They are doing it for energy. Plain and simple. Most countries do not have entire mountain ranges made of coal, like USA, China, and a few others. Israel (by way of USA & UN) does not want Iran to have energy independence. But why NOT spin this into "OMG Iran has a nuke!!" to scare up a few drum beats of war, if you're one of the psychopaths behind the curtain??

Even worse though is the North Korean progress, which imo is not nearly as advanced an energy program. Some spinners have even tried to suggest that they would use spent fuel rods to make a bomb. That's as ridiculous as saying that someone is going to drive a car, to make gas.

This is just spin, designed to incite support for McCain's favorite song.

Originally posted by sunny_2008ny


Iran no doubt has the capability to produce and use a nuclear weapon. Despite all the threat of sanctions and international pressure, we have to accept the fact that Iran has a nuclear bomb. The question is will they ever use it? If yes then against whom? Israel, US? Remember that Iran has missiles that can fly a range of 3000 kms. If any of these are nuclear tipped them they can reach Rome or Paris.

The question is how many coutries view the Iranian nuclear program as a threat, besides US and Israel?

www.nytimes.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

It sounds like you think the President of Iran is a liar and does not plan of wiping Israel off the map.

Have you seen The Sum of All Fears? If you haven't a key plot line is a nuke is smuggled into Baltimore and detonated. Missiles are not the only way to get a nuke to its target.

reply to post by chips


While Israel can most likely bomb Iran into the dark ages, it will not. Why? Because most of the Middle East, Europe and Asia will lose millions of people as Iran blindly strikes back with a nightmare collection of biological and chemical weapons.

[edit on 20-11-2008 by ebee2]

Originally posted by centurion1211

Still, IMO neither arabs or persians should have nuclear weapons.

WHY?

If I can have an apple, then an arab can have an apple.

If I'm not allowed to have that apple then, the arab can't have it.

If we fight over it, then no one can have the apple.

If I have an apple, then I have to respect the fact the arab want's an apple.


Today's simple wisdom for you I hope you get the message rapidly.
Of how silly your point was.

Originally posted by mind is the universe

Originally posted by centurion1211

Still, IMO neither arabs or persians should have nuclear weapons.

WHY?

If I can have an apple, then an arab can have an apple.

If I'm not allowed to have that apple then, the arab can't have it.

If we fight over it, then no one can have the apple.

If I have an apple, then I have to respect the fact the arab want's an apple.


Today's simple wisdom for you

I hope you get the message rapidly.
Of how silly your point was.

Whats good for the goose isn't good for the gander.

Some simple wisdom for you courtesy of my grand pappy.

If Iran has enough radioactive material to make one bomb then good for them, and to assist even further, I think Israel or the US should give Iran another eleven nukes to make it an even dozen.

But not in the way they want.

Iran's persistence in this is to their destruction.

The sooner Israel or the US get on with it, the sooner we can move on to other problem areas.

Syria.

reply to post by mind is the universe


By the way, Mind, Iranians are not Arabs.

They're Persian.

And normally they hate Arabs,

And Arabs hate Persians.

Originally posted by CharlesMartel
It sounds like you think the President of Iran is a liar and does not plan of wiping Israel off the map.

It sounds like you believe politicians.

Do You believe American politicians all tell the truth?
Do you believe Iranian politicians are more trustworthy than American politicians?

Do you realise this "quote" has since been proven to be a mistranslation, and was first printed in a little, Jewish-owned news-sheet in Canada, and spread from there?

Originally posted by jd140

Originally posted by mind is the universe

Originally posted by centurion1211

Still, IMO neither arabs or persians should have nuclear weapons.

WHY?

If I can have an apple, then an arab can have an apple.

If I'm not allowed to have that apple then, the arab can't have it.

If we fight over it, then no one can have the apple.

If I have an apple, then I have to respect the fact the arab want's an apple.


Today's simple wisdom for you

I hope you get the message rapidly.
Of how silly your point was.

Whats good for the goose isn't good for the gander.

Some simple wisdom for you courtesy of my grand pappy.

My wisdom to you,

Disern what's good for the goose isn't for the gander in this scenario

I'm all ears

Originally posted by dooper

Iran's persistence in this is to their destruction.

Dooper............


STOP trolling. Back up your statements, otherwise don't post it
Please don't derail the topic thanks.

Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by mind is the universe

 

By the way, Mind, Iranians are not Arabs.

They're Persian.

And normally they hate Arabs,

And Arabs hate Persians.

I know. The guy I replied too, stated he didnt want Arabs or Persians to have nucs.

So I did respond correctly to what he said. I made a clear example, whether be a Persian, polynesian, or Arab, The point is Dooper (as you fail to cop in that post above .) it doesn't matter what race you are, the fact is that he singled out one or two races, Race should not be a factor in deciding who has nuc's or who doesn't. It's just ignorant, racist, and absurd. It's crap talk to be quite frank. It's mind boggling to see the ignorance still with America in general towards the world, about ANY issue. It's just unbelievable.

I'm embarrassed right now. Thats said enough in one line.

Let's be a little smarter than this.



[edit on 20-11-2008 by mind is the universe]

[edit on 20-11-2008 by mind is the universe]