It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Would Islamoterrorists use a nuke given the chance?

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 11:28 AM
link   
Re: the current post on nuke use in WWII. Some seem to think that the sheer horror of the event was sufficient to deter reuse of a nuclear device. Who here believes that given the chance, those radical Islamists that declared war on the apostates of Islam would decline the use of a nuclear device because of the "horror factor"?


My opinion is that given the past craven acts of Islamic terrorists, they would willingly use any nuclear (or biological weapon for that matter) without hesitation.

What say you?

[edit on 12-11-2008 by RKWWWW]



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 11:42 AM
link   
Would I nail a very good looking A-lister celebrity given the chance? Of course I would.

two lines.



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 11:44 AM
link   
I dont know about no islamoterririst's but I sure do know that the US military/government would be more than happy to oblige you in this matter.



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 11:47 AM
link   
Before 9/11 was it even concievable to the general public that Islamic radicals would waltz into American airports, armed with boxcutters and fly jets full of people and fuel into high profile American targets?

My advice, be ready for anything you can imagine...nothing is impossible; its just that some things are very hard to do and may take more time to plan and put into effect.



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 11:53 AM
link   
There ARE NO ISLAMOTERRORISTS!

They're made up (invented) by the CIA. They aren't even fighting. These I.U.D.'s are built, installed, and supported by the CIA(Freemasons) to keep the war going. Because, they don't mind killing American soldiers (especially black soldiers).

The REAL terrorists are these NWO leaders, the CIA, the NSA, and the ROUGE groups and contractors of the government who think that they run the country's secrets! Because, they are owned by these NWO elitists.

Keeping secrets and secret societies ARE treason and the force for tyranny and crime!! That's why we have freedom of the press, to expose these things, so that they can be infiltrated and dismantled! Eisenhower and JFK both WARNED us about the secrets of the Freemasons and the industrial-military complex.

NOONE who seeks power is uncorrupt. The very effort is megalomaniacal. The only power should be in the hands of an intelligent and free People!

Am I the only one who sees this? It's obvious that we are all being duped, while they try to keep the benevolent aliens off of the planet with a hidden war against the powers of good in the galaxy that seek to FREE HUMANITY, which would destroy their power-structure.

in Liberty,
Rok



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 11:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by warrenb
I dont know about no islamoterririst's...


In the future, let your non-response to a thread be the indication that you don't know the answer to the question that is posed.


[edit on 12-11-2008 by RKWWWW]



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 11:56 AM
link   
if you are asking this on ATS then you are looking for a specific answer, for someone to tell you Yes, They Would.
And as such:
Yes, They would.



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 12:02 PM
link   
Without a doubt, they would. Now it's a matter of geography. Who'd be the lucky winner.

London, Madrid, Rome, and and even Moscow are as likely targets as New York.



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 12:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by kidney thief
if you are asking this on ATS then you are looking for a specific answer, for someone to tell you Yes, They Would.
And as such:
Yes, They would.


Don't tell me what you think I want to hear. I'm not disingenously asking the question. I think either view could be held. For instance, one could argue that the use of a nuclear device by terrorists would be a PR nightmare, eroding any sympathy towards them. What do you think?



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 12:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by roknhrdcor
Because, they don't mind killing American soldiers (especially black soldiers).


I think I have to disagree on your racial bias.

www.icasualties.org...

Of course this numbers have only been fixed to hide the true crimes against the black race?? Enlighten me please. I anxiously await your intelligent and thought provoking response.



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 12:08 PM
link   





posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 12:09 PM
link   
I fail to see how terrorists could acquire nukes,unless pakistan gets taken over in which case its the USA's fault anyway,but how would terrorists launch nuclear missiles exactly? or are you talking about the non existant myth of a suitcase nuke?



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 12:11 PM
link   
I can't see why not, but I think the whole terrorist group like putting some effort into their work.
Like 9/11 for instance, it was tricky and must have taken a while to plan.
But then again, more infidels they kill the more points they get.

HIGH SCORES
1. oSamax0r
2. oSamax0r
3. oSamax0r



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 12:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by roknhrdcor
These I.U.D.'s are built, installed, and supported by the CIA(Freemasons) to keep the war going. Because, they don't mind killing American soldiers (especially black soldiers).


Soooo, the CIA is implanting birth control devices to what end?

Sorry, I know you meant IEDs but after I read IUD the rest of your post kind of lost its smack...



posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 12:17 PM
link   
the original posters message was deleted

so this thread might as well be deleted as well




posted on Nov, 12 2008 @ 12:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by RKWWWW

Originally posted by kidney thief
if you are asking this on ATS then you are looking for a specific answer, for someone to tell you Yes, They Would.
And as such:
Yes, They would.


Don't tell me what you think I want to hear. I'm not disingenously asking the question. I think either view could be held. For instance, one could argue that the use of a nuclear device by terrorists would be a PR nightmare, eroding any sympathy towards them. What do you think?


Of course they would use them. Some of them, at least, wouldn't hesitate to use them.

As hard as it is for rational human beings to believe, history is littered with people who don't give a **** about anybody else, or even themselves.

Just take a look at a couple of examples: Stalin, Pol Pot, Hitler. And Hitler didn't just START a war......one of the last things he said in the run-up to the end of the war was "If Germany is going to go down, I want to take the rest of the world with me."......or words to that effect.

And what about those 'school shooters'? Granted, they murder only a couple of dozen at most, before killing themselves. But some of them would have murdered a LOT more, given the chance.

Of course there are people in the world who don't mind destroying the WHOLE world.....themselves included.

And since the muslim religion teaches that it is honourable to destroy their enemies without mercy, in order to attain 'paradise'......well.....I would definitely say that, yes, there ARE people who wouldn't hesitate to use them, and destroy millions in the process.







 
1

log in

join