Impeach Obama "movement" is already underway

OK, first of all, impeach does not mean remove from office. Secondly, in order to bring up impeachment hearings, there must be some criminal activity.

So my question is this: what criminal act has Obama committed?

Who cares?

They always start memes based on accusing democrats of doing what they just did.

It's called messing with people's heads.

reply to post by Major Discrepancy


You're absolutely right. I replied last night in the fog of falling asleep. I was referring to Harding, not Hoover.
In fact, it was Hoover that was integral in bringing justice back to the corruption based Government AFTER the scandal. My bad.

[edit on 9-11-2008 by Jay-in-AR]

[edit on 9-11-2008 by Jay-in-AR]

Originally posted by YourForever

Did not Bush lose his home state of Connecticut?

None of this changes the fact Florida was sabotaged.

Connecticut was Bush's birth-state. Bush represented Texas as Governor, so that makes Texas his home-state. Just like Algore represented Tennessee as Senator, and he happened to born there also.

How could you expect Florida to support Algore when his homestate didn't? At least John McCain won the state he represented.

FACTS:

Democrats talked about Bush's impeachment before he took office.
Republicans are talking about Obama's impeachment before he takes office.

IT'S A DRAW!

reply to post by MOFreemason



Wow, that is amazing. I knew of some of these, but Article XX stumps me. Could you explain this one, please? How has Bush been allowed to get away with this is beyond my comprehension. And I totally agree with you, nationalizing our banks, IS socialism. But the right just doesn't see it. Barack has posed a tremendous threat to the control of the republicans. Their obnoxious taste for greed and control is beyond explanation. They forget within the scriptures that greed is a sin, and that a strong message was given to the rich man. And, may I say, that Jesus practiced socialism. He was always preaching to take care of the poor. That is one reason why God destroyed Sodom and Gormorrah. They were wealthy and failed to take care of their poor.

For those speaking of Dems thinking/speaking about impeachment before Pres. Bush ever took office....most likely could be attributed to their belief the "election was stolen." (Not my view).

Today's Repubs talking about impeachment of Obama before the man has even been sworn-in is just PLAIN, BABY, SORE-LOSER talk.

There are absolutely no merits for his trial of impeachment. NONE.

Read your U.S. Constitution folks.

Originally posted by RRconservative

FACTS:

Democrats talked about Bush's impeachment before he took office.
Republicans are talking about Obama's impeachment before he takes office.

IT'S A DRAW!

You forget RR the Dems reserve the right to play trump: The Race Card

a little Euchre metaphor all in good fun

reply to post by nj2day


Gotta use it once in a while, right?!!?

Originally posted by RRconservative
So it's perfectly OK for a George Soros funded website to encourage impeachment for Bush, but let some right-wingers get together to do the same to Lord Obama??? The Bush Impeachment organizers were busy planning before Bush took office also.

Like I said earlier...what comes around goes around. Bush was a man and he handled it, can Obama?

So you're saying because the Democrats were retarded (in your opinion) about impeaching Bush, it means Republicans are now justified in being equally retarded?
Have you finally admitted that Reps are just as bad as Dems?
Also, I'd like to see some evidence that people were preparing to impeach Bush before taking office in his first term.

Originally posted by rexpop

So you're saying because the Democrats were retarded (in your opinion) about impeaching Bush, it means Republicans are now justified in being equally retarded?
Have you finally admitted that Reps are just as bad as Dems?
Also, I'd like to see some evidence that people were preparing to impeach Bush before taking office in his first term.

"So you're saying"

Isn't it funny that when someone starts a post with that phrase it is almost 100% opposite to what the person is actually saying?

What I am saying is......that some people are surprised and shocked that this is happening, when in the recent past it has happened before. What makes Obama better than Bush in regards to his President-Elect status?

BTW there are a couple of examples of preparing to impeach Bush located in this thread.

reply to post by RRconservative


Wow. Why would you stoop that low? Al Gore won the popular vote, so it's not like he was some sort of pathetic loser who history will forget. Honestly, RR, come on man.

Originally posted by Irish M1ck
[Al Gore won the popular vote

For the sake of argument, I'm going to point out that this happened because the electoral system is outdated and flawed.

Using this as a justification on why Obama is better than Bush doesn't work IMHO.

There may be evidence to lead one to believe that the Vote was rigged, however, I will not hold the election process against Bush unless irrefutable evidence is presented that the vote was rigged...

reply to post by Irish M1ck


Since you are talking about popular vote..Algore lost the popular vote in his homestate of Tennessee, the state that cost him the election. That's pathetic. Can you imagine what would have been said if McCain would have lost Arizona, or if Obama would have lost Illinois?

reply to post by RRconservative


But he won popular vote of the country... which is NOT pathetic. Tennessee is quite a red state, and it's not exactly surprising that he lost it. I mean, I think we all know what those people cling to...

When Bush was elected (although that can be debated) I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until he started screwing the pooch on virtually every front he faced.

If and when Obama screws up, I'll be all over him too. Until then, I remain optimistic that he'll be a fine leader. I wish others would do the same. The arguing going on here now is what this country needs to get away from.

As for Rush Limbaugh, well, there isn't much to say. The man is a loud-mouthed baffoon. He PROMOTES division. And why wouldn't he? It is what makes him his money. Which he in turn spends on prescription pain-killers all the while derailing people who use drugs.

I thought the man had lost his credibility a long time ago. Guess not.

*I noticed I took an unnecessary stab at Limbaugh, but geeze, I can't stand that guy.

[edit on 9-11-2008 by Jay-in-AR]

HA!!

There is also a 'Obama National Holiday' movement underway!

Story Here

Unfreak'n believable! The impeachers and the holidayers need to sit back and see if this guy actually does anything worthy of a holiday and/or impeachment!

Yes history will look back at George Bush, since he likes to talk about it so much himself, and say 'This is what not to do when you become president'. In the same sections of the histrory books they'll talk about how the person, who possibly had the election stolen from him, went on to do great things including championing the enviroment, getting a nobel prize etc etc etc.

I gotta admit I saw Al Gore a little over a week ago, and if that Al Gore was the same one one 8 years ago we'd be saying goodbye to President Al Gore and not Bush =/.

reply to post by RRconservative


I see we have a glutton for punishment here wanting to keep W and the likes of him in the WH... maybe you should be on scrips or something and save the rest of the country from your ill ways of thinking...

Fortunately this recent election records the voices of what most Americans REALLY want and don't want....

Impeachment ... to educate your small brain... is only associated with misconduct IN OFFICE.... you wanna impeach Obama as SENATOR??? and for what idiot? he has done absolutely nothing as Senator that could possibly be construed as an impeachable offense. He is now President ELECT... ELECT, does the definition of that term somehow escape you? He is not YET the President, and as such is not impeachable as President.... DUH...

But Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld and the like are ARE however impeachable and should be... unfortunately we now have Pelosi blocking that avenue... perhaps we should impeach HER first and then march down the chain of the present administration with charges... for certainly there are more than we can count...

to even suggest the impeachment of Obama at this juncture is ridiculous and serves to emphasize your ignorance...

I'd suggest you move to alaska ... perhaps you should look into the AIP... surley the Palins would deliver more for you than a proven LEADER...

reply to post by Jay-in-AR

Originally posted by Jay-in-AR
My only hope is that justice will be served on this, the nation's MOST renegade administration perhaps since J. Edgar Hoover. Although I'm not even sure that Hoover's crimes compare to Bush's.

The problem with your post wasn't that you said J. Edgar Hoover, when you meant Warren G. Harding, but that J. Edgar Hoover was never P.O.T.U.S.. Herbert Hoover was, and his presidency was/is often blamed for the Great Depression. That's a common mistake, just thought you might want to clear it up.

[edit on 9-11-2008 by Artephius Abraxas Helios]

[edit on 9-11-2008 by Artephius Abraxas Helios]

reply to post by Artephius Abraxas Helios


Yes, I had the wrong guy on two different levels. HAHA. I knew what I was thinking it just came out wrong and I didn't proof read it. I make those sorts of mistakes quite often when I am at the point of exhaustion. It was Herbert Hoover who refused the pardons of the crimes. Not J. Edgar Hoover. I appreciate the clarification. If Major Discrepancy hadn't brought it to my attention, it would have remained there.

Actually, that isn't the first time I've even made that exact same mistake. It may be dislexia or something. My mind goes back to the Teapot Dome scandal because we've seen a replay of the exact same events with Haliburton and Bush. But when thinking back you mean to type out Warren G and end up typing J. Edgar for some reason. Probably because another player in those events was another Hoover. The one that was actually a president and allowed these crimes be brought to justice.



[edit on 9-11-2008 by Jay-in-AR]