Mr. Barak Obama... really?

As the title of my thread suggests, that's my question.

Mr Barak Obama... really?

Think about this for a moment.

There are several threads on here where ATS members have been banging on about vote rigging, and Obama being the real change, and so on and so forth. The fact that Obama "won", seems to have have suggested to some people that there was no possibility of vote rigging in this election.

But was there?

What if Mr Obama was picked from the very beginning to win? Not in the sense that his 'political party' wanted him to win, but in the sense that TPTB required him to win... Required Obama to win, not because he can bring about change, or hope to the regular American, but because it is a 'dream' that is being sold to the average American. Then after four more long years of suffering, there will be an opportunity to vote for someone else, who promises change 'we can all believe in'.

Thoughts?

this is going to be funny because although this is a conspiracy web site, and things like this are discussed all the time about every president and person in power, people will get all offended that you think this of obama, or just ignorantly say "because he's the best" or "because we all want and voted for him" i mean seriously, lately these obama people are REALLY devoted... just to warn, you'll get alot of that, alot of "this is not a conspiracy, not obama" even though this clearly is a conspiracy site and these thoughts should be entertained.

btw, personally his affiliation with acorn, voter registration and all the voter fraud from the preliminaries with clinton, and his push to vote early for some reason, are great evidence that there clearly could have been some fishy tricks in this election, all towards voting obama

funny how vote rigging has not even been an after thought in this election. They were sure talking about it before actual voting day, then poof the MSM dropped it like a hot potato since the "right" guy won.

If Mccain had won, the media would have been crying foul, vote rigging!

I mean my god he is clearly linked to Acorn who was caught red handed flubbing voter registration. If this were a republican connection the red flags would have been burning.

It will be interesting to see the MSM handle the president during the next 4 years. It was such a love fest through this whole affair, will they even have the nerve to question Obama on anything he does badly? Or will this be the most flawless term ever held by any president in the history of man?

reply to post by PowerSlave


No it won't be, the honeymoon is over. It is time for the media to start tearing him down. They have to start tearing him down to get the people to listen to them in four years.

Voter fraud and vote rigging? Yes, oh god yes. This is the way it always happens. You notice the republicans lose and you hear no claims of foul play(yet) or anything just some disappointment, bad attitudes, and some congratulations.

Had the republicans won they would be screaming at the top of their lungs. When it comes to the presidential election it has always been my position to say they all cheat, it just depends on who cheats the best. This year it was the dems.

reply to post by dampnickers


This is more than plausible, especially given the lack of content in Obama's speeches and perhaps more importantly the fact that he promises to drill in Alaska (reduce dependency on foreign oil) and expand military presence only not in Iraq. But even Bush was planning to move beyond Iraq

Obama is the "messiah." Didn't you get the memo?

reply to post by SpeakerofTruth


Clearly not...

reply to post by dampnickers


Of course he was hand picked by TPTB. All presidents are chosen by TPTB The only question is what agenda is he fulfilling for them. I think they let this play out for a while until the numbers were reduced then they called Obama and Clinton into the chambers and told them how the game was going to play out.

I really don't know what their end game is I can only speculate. I just don't believe that they have our best interest at heart.

It's all about the margin of victory. Had it been closer, than I think that some mention would have been made by certain elements. Exit polls also agred with the results, when that was not the case in the Bush wins.