It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
o I have decided that the change that might come from the internet takes time. Maybe we do not have the time, but slowly but surely more and more people get the or a message. So let's hope there are some 'usefull' people between them that haven't received it yet.
Oct 27, 5:23 PM (ET)
By ANICK JESDANUN
NEW YORK (AP) - Circulation at the nation's daily newspapers is falling faster than anticipated this year as readers continue their migration to the Internet and papers narrow their distribution to cut costs.
The development, which compounds the fiscal challenge of plummeting advertising revenue, was revealed Monday when the Audit Bureau of Circulations released sales totals reported by newspapers for April through September.
Combined weekday circulation of all 507 papers that reported circulation totals this year and last averaged 38,165,848 in the six months ending in September, 4.6 percent below 40,022,356 a year earlier. The aggregate drop was only 2.6 percent in the September 2007 period, compared with September 2006.
Sunday circulation fell faster than daily - 4.8 percent, to 43,631,646 at the 571 papers with comparable totals. A year ago, Sunday circulation fell 3.5 percent.
Daily circulation at 16 of the 25 largest papers fell more than 5 percent in the latest period.
Circulation has been dropping at newspapers for decades, a trend sped up by readers shifting to the Internet. Newspapers also have lost advertising in recent years because of the Internet, and that decline accelerated this summer as the weak economy prompted advertisers to pull back on spending.
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
I tend to dream the impossible dream quite often, and I've always been that way.
Certainly understood. Especially when you receive so much positive encouragement. I hope you'll excuse my pragmatism, it's just that my mind tells me that while the world is a big place, it is also a very small place. And I see much greater success in affecting that much smaller world that lies right outside our doors.
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
Absolutely we should start outside our door, but if we are successful there, why STOP there?
This isn't to deter anyone from dreaming the possibilities, but rather encouraging all of us to remember that the fabled journey begins with the fabled first step, followed by the second and so on. The next can't be taken before completing the one before it.
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
I've just visited several threads that have one thing in common. Each thread develops two "sides", and those sides go after each other with a vengeance.
England against Iceland, Obama against McCain, Wall Street against Main Street, each blaming the other, WHILE THE REAL CULPRITS sit back, laugh and wait for the wars to start.
Who are those that are sitting back and waiting?
You know who they are, those that always instigated the wars, the fights, the phony political disputes. They are the people that control the wealth.
Some say they are the Illuminati, the NWO, the Masons, the Bilderbergers, the Templars, and a whole list of boogymen. They're too smart to have a name. They don't need one. They are pulling all of the strings. The Golden Rule, those that have the gold make the rules.
Please stop blaming each other. These are just diversions that are keeping you from concentrating on what should be done. You're so busy fighting each other, you are being blinded by those that have put you in jeorpardy.
This is a CONSPIRACY forum.
You want the ULTIMATE CONSPIRACY. It is being perpetrated on all of us right now, and the war has just begun.
What will YOU do, continue to fight with each other, or decide to concentrate your efforts on finding the true enemy and ferreting them out?
You're smart people, aren't you. Figure it out. It is the ultimate treasure hunt, and you have all the evidence you need right at your fingertips.
Now who is willing to PLAY?
I don't understand. "They" control the wealth? Where do they go spend all this "wealth" when the rest of us are the ones who see what is going on? Are they just hoarding away this money for some big purchase? I see this topic time and time again about a few people in charge wanting all the wealth but in reality if they had all this money then the people would see them spend it. And if they didnt spend it then what good would the wealth be doing them? Are they driving fancy cars and living in big houses LOL? No? They are controlling countries? But still what do they do with this moeny?
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by princeofpeace
I don't understand. "They" control the wealth? Where do they go spend all this "wealth" when the rest of us are the ones who see what is going on? Are they just hoarding away this money for some big purchase? I see this topic time and time again about a few people in charge wanting all the wealth but in reality if they had all this money then the people would see them spend it. And if they didnt spend it then what good would the wealth be doing them? Are they driving fancy cars and living in big houses LOL? No? They are controlling countries? But still what do they do with this moeny?
The wealth buys them power. That is what makes many of these people tick. Look at the money spent by lobbyists to buy Congressional Representatives and Senators, who then vote for whatever interest the PTB hold. That, in turn, buys them more power, and the cycle goes on. Some people acquire money purely as a power trip in itself. They don't feel a need to spend it. They are hoarding it, much like some recluses save every single thing that they have ever acquired in life. Their houses are wall to wall, floor to ceiling filled with everything from old newspapers to empty cereal boxes. Anal Retentive to the extreme.
Originally posted by justgeneric
hehehe well here's my idea (fantasy).
The Day the World Stood Still.
En mass people say NO. No protests in the street, nothing like that. Just say no.
No work period.
If enough people did this for even a day....it would make an impact. trouble is that "enough" people would have to consist of MILLIONS.
Nice fantasy I think, next to the one I have about Brad Pitt...but that another issue...
getting an immense and vastly different group(s) of people together with different fears, worries and needs (like basics - eating, shelter etc) and have them all act completely passively????
fantasy. Will never happen.