It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Their money comes from Trade Surplus. They generate wealth. We don't have a surplus.. we create money out of thin air, while 70% of our GDP comes from the likes of Wal Mart and McDonalds.. which sends wealth away .. not bringing it in..
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
It is an elaborate scheme, and all countries are involved. If you guys think they aren't happily supporting it, then you guys are...well...wrong.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
America has everything to loose.
China at least as a pro-con sheet to look at...
America? We get to stare at the chains of consumerism we bound our fate to..
by retinoid receptor
Was it from us or was it through great innovation on their part?
Beijing will use its foreign exchange reserves, the largest in the world, to support and accelerate overseas expansion and acquisitions by Chinese companies, Wen Jiabao, the country’s premier, said in comments published on Tuesday.
The Chinese government has intentionally run a large trade surplus and built up a $2 trillion reserve in foreign holdings - much of it in US sovereign debt. So they have the cash needed to do the buying.
China has long been scouring the globe for energy and commodities to feed its thrumming economy. What is new is the leadership’s determination to increase outbound foreign direct investment, or O.F.D.I., as it weans the economy off low-value, export-oriented manufacturing. The deal by Sinopec, the largest Chinese oil refiner, to buy the Swiss oil explorer Addax for $7.24 billion last month was China’s largest overseas acquisition yet.
Letting the Chinese get control of more mineral resources is a bad idea. China already restricts export of a variety of minerals including rare ones not available elsewhere.
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
reply to post by HimWhoHathAnEar
Now you are totally switching the tables and talking about banks vs. people. I pretty much agree with what you are writing about that, but that wasn't what I was talking about.
* DiverCity:
seekingalpha.com...
Agreed that the USGovt can orchestrate a big devaluation by the means you describe. However, as others have said, that would be too disorderly and leave matters out of central bank control. An orderly, albeit very abrupt, devaluation is the goal, I would think.
On Jul 16 11:00 AM Screwloose wrote:
> Do you still need a "bank holiday" to devalue a floating currency?
> Under a fixed-value gold standard, maybe; but these days?
>
> All a big devaluation would take is for the Fed to reveal that it's
> been fiddling the "indirect" Treasury bids through secret swap deals
> with other central banks and that China is now only buying the short
> end.
>
> Leak something like that and devaluing the dollar isn't going to
> be a problem - although supporting it from total collapse might be....
>
>
> To devalue it only against gold/silver they simply need to direct
> the COMEX-manipulating banks to take a "holiday" - preferably a permanent
> one.
Jul 17 12:43 PM
# admin on August 1st, 2009 1:40 am
blog.macatawa .net
The latest information I have read is that September 30, 2009 there will be a switch to the new Treasury Dollar from the Federal Reserve Note. This new Treasury Dollar supposedly will be in compliance with the Basil III anti-money laundering rules. This September 30 date also matches up with the current speculation on the upcoming Bank Holiday. The new Treasury Dollar is supposed to be backed by gold and will be worth 1/35th a gram of gold. Not all banks are cooperating with this move.
How the exchange will occur with Fed Notes to Treasury Dollars, I am not sure. But if not all banks cooperate with the switch from the Fed, then there will likely be runs on those banks. There has only been one proven way to stop a run on banks…you guessed it, a Bank Holiday.
Clayton