Most of us here have at least some cursory knowledge of the NAU. For those who don't, this is a basic outline.
The countries of Mexico, Unites States and Canada join in a trilateral union. It's extremely similar to the European Union model. Actually it's a
copy of it. Each country keeps it's name but is subservient to a ruling cabal made up of members of the the three nations. Our respective currencies
are subplanted by a single monetary unit, affectionetly known as the Amero. Most trade will be dictated by this ruling cabal.
Now, when this merger was accomplished in Europe, it tok the better part of a half century to implement. This was the testing grounds. The African
Union is in place, the Asian Union is almost a reality. In fact, it exists in everything but name. It is currently named the Asia Cooperation
Dialogue.
North America is the last hold out in this world wide movement, which has mostly been dictated undemocratically. When they gave Irelands population
the oppurtunity to vote to become a member state of the EU, the people overwhelmingly voted NO. Lesson learned.
The people behind this movement now have North America in an excellent position to bring in this Corporate Union. The SPP meetings of the last several
years have all been geared towards this goal. They have also held other meetings in Banff, Alberta dealing with this issue. Is it a coincedence that
two of the last three years, the Bilderberger meetings have been held on North American soil? This is the same time frame for the start of the SPP
meetings, starting in Waco in 2005. I think every good Conspiracy Theorist knows that there are no such things as coincedences.
Alright so we have established the beginnings of this secret agenda to install a NAU here. So the question is; how is this the Endgame?
Simple.
At first, I thought this may have been an attemted economic coup but I was wrong. This entire house of cards that has been built up through the
subprime mortage scheme and the housing bubble were designed with this goal in mind. If you think about the last big crash in the late 80's, what did
it preceed?
NAFTA.
Nafta was one of the things that came out of the crash of '87. i think history has shown that, with this agreement, the people didn't want it but
the politicians and the Multi Nationals did and we ended up with it.
Coincidently( ;: ) today was the day back in '92 that NAFTA was signed into agreement here in Canada.
If they need panic, dissillusionment and fear to help move these things along, they have certainly built it. They have managed to have the entire
population on edge. They went ahead and signed the bill when, as far as I can tell from all the stories I have read and polls I have seen that a
majority of Americans didn't weant them to. Some just saw it as a waste of taxpayers dollars, some saw it as too little, too late; and others saw it
for what it truly may have been. A power grab.
Also, remember that Obama said during the primaries that we was willing to reopen NAFTA and have a hard look at it. He then changed his thoughts in an
interview with Fortune Magazine to this.
"I'm not a big believer in doing things unilaterally," Obama said. "I'm a big believer in opening up a dialogue and figuring out how we can
make this work for all people."
money.cnn.com...
It looks like this guy is pulling ahead in the race although tonights debate might change that.
The claim most often referenced is 2010 for the NAU to be in place. Well, there's no question that our countries are going into recession's. If it
lasts, and by all indicators it will, to late '09, early 2010, selling this plan to the masses won't be diffucult if packaged right. the security
measures are already in place through the Patriot Act and the Anti Terrorism Act.
(continued with sources)