Modern research in migrations and genetics confirming Pre-historic civilizations

Uh.... Mike Tyson has a brow ridge.
Guess he's not Atlantean.

reply to post by haika


I do it all the time- hey they didn't ask for my vote when they changed it!

Oh by the way is your sign on Japanese, Polynesian or some nonsensical creation?



[edit on 6/2/09 by Hanslune]

reply to post by Hanslune


My sign? You mean my nickname?
If that's what you mean, it's a nick my Dad gave me. It kinda sounds like my name.
Not Japanese or anything, just something out of Dad's brain

I was too lazy to think of something cooler when I signed up in ATS.

reply to post by haika


If it's the multi-colored skull you meant, I got it from a drawing from the Day of the Dead celebration in Mexico.

reply to post by haika


Kool, it has a number of meaning in Japanese, its modern meaning is 'crash' in the computer sense and in Polynesian 'to gasp', but we digress!

Getting back on track here

Neanderthal genome

The entire genome of a 38,000-year-old Neanderthal has been sequenced by a team of scientists in Germany. The group is already extracting DNA from other ancient Neanderthal bones and hopes that the genomes will allow an unprecedented comparison between modern humans and their closest evolutionary relative.

Comparisons with the human genome may uncover evidence of interbreeding between Neanderthals and humans, the genomes of which overlap by more than 99%. They certainly had enough time for fraternization — Homo sapiens emerged as a separate species by about 400,000 years ago, and Neanderthals became extinct just 30,000 years ago. Their last common ancestor lived about 660,000 years ago, give or take 140,000 years.

reply to post by Hanslune


I was just reading about it in a past issue of NatGeo.

(second line)

Originally posted by Hollywood11
We're talking about is apes in general vs. humans.

Apes have brow ridges where humans have an open flat third eye chakra.

Yes I've gathered that we're talking about that. Aside from the fact the cro magnon is not an ape.

Is this an apeman?



And this is the same apeman?

That's pretty sick if an atlantean zoo-keeper broke into the neanderthal or cro-magnon cage at night and "inter-breeded" with them.


[edit on 6-2-2009 by Hollywood11]

All should take a look at the Genographic Project by national geographic.
Genographic Project

Originally posted by Hollywood11
That's pretty sick if an atlantean zoo-keeper broke into the neanderthal or cro-magnon cage at night and "inter-breeded" with them.

... Which means what?

That the Atlanteans where ape-men?

reply to post by merka

That's pretty sick if an atlantean zoo-keeper broke into the neanderthal or cro-magnon cage at night and "inter-breeded" with them.

So Hollywood, instead of discussing the issue you've decided just to put out yet more nonsense? An excellent example of your knowledge level, LOL. I think we can safely say that you have nothing to say and are demonstating that you're going to take the nuts way out.

Don't deny ignorance - use it to hide your deep lack of knowledge.






[edit on 6/2/09 by Hanslune]

Originally posted by coredrill
All should take a look at the Genographic Project by national geographic.
Genographic Project

That's very limited, has alot of things missing, and a lot of holes

This article, while focusing more on languages, is much more complete and correct
www.thamazigh.com...

DNA evidence of Atlantis-
www.redicecreations.com...

[edit on 12-2-2009 by Hollywood11]

reply to post by Hollywood11


For DNA Evidence to Atlanteans..first of all you should have some Atlantean DNA to compare the other DNA to.

Where you get Atlantean DNA?? huh?

[edit on 13/2/09 by coredrill]

Originally posted by Hollywood11
What it shows is that historian's ideas of the past and the history of South and Central America is all wrong , whether it is the race of the people that had been there, or whether it is Pyramid culture.

Hi Hollywood,
I noticed earlier in this thread that you cited the Hall of Ma'at website.
www.hallofmaat.com...
For deeper insight into your investigation, you should poke around there a little more. Some pretty smart people laying out some intelligent rebuttal of a lot of pseudo-archaeology.

There is a lot of highly speculative stuff out there that only serves the purpose of inspiring debate like this. But the fact is, the real story is equally as fascinating, and unfolding daily. By all means, operate on the fringes because that's where the fun is, but don't get caught up in material that is easily refuted. Demand citations, use a bibliography and work backwards...don't take anybody's word for it. But have fun. And let us know what you find.