It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
According to the lawsuit, Philip Seaton, 61, went to have a circumcision last Octoberas part of treatment for a medical condition. Seaton said when he woke up from the procedure, he realized his penis had been amputated.
The lawsuit states that Patterson received consent to perform a circumcision and only a circumcision, and that Seaton did not consent to his penis being removed.
Kevin George, the plaintiff's attorney, said Patterson amputated the organ after finding cancer, but he only had consent to remove the foreskin.
"Sometimes you have an emergency and you have to do this, but he could very easily closed him up and said, 'Here are your options. You have cancer,' and the family would have said, 'We want a second opinion. This is a big deal,'" George said.
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
Hes 61 get over it.. Its not like he can use it now anymore anyway..
Then again.. there is Viagra... So who knows... Still funny none the less..
Originally posted by fox_3000au
reply to post by Russian soldier
....and if you did get someone elses attached.....
....would that make you gay for playing with it?
Food for thought so too speak...
Fox.
tallywhacker
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
Hes 61 get over it.. Its not like he can use it now anymore anyway..
Then again.. there is Viagra... So who knows... Still funny none the less..