posted on Sep, 22 2008 @ 06:13 PM
Everyone must leave the internet! That's every man, woman, and child must now log off of the internet, and never log back on again. Anyone caught
on the internet will be held indefinitely for the violation of this new, permanent ordinance.
^^Can you imagine what that would be like if it were really come true? Do you think such a ordinance could ever happen to where accessing the intenet
is a crime, even though the internet only then is left free so it is accessable for catching every single would-be violator of the ordinance? Would
anyone actually even dare sneak onto the internet with that kind of deterrent that is for tempting would-be violators in a world turned that strict in
what they then consider criminal (the internet itself based on some court's ruling in favor of what the religious world claimed and in favor of
what the psychiatry world claimed)?
On another note: This is just an example of when you allow religion and psychiatry to be an unstoppable authority, trumping any other form of
authority. And you thought some guy that's schizophonic was nuts when actually he was just a good nuts, not a wicked nuts. Yes, there are two kinds
of nuts. The wicked nuts is what you should give the real help to in stopping them, in measures, from even getting on a level where they can hurt
others in ways. Does not taking you away from your pursuit of happiness hurt in a way? Just because some religious person or psychiatrist said what
they believe is bad for ppl doesn't mean their belief, or so-called professional oppinion, should cause the enforcing of any strict action against
any other person in any way, shape, or form.
Sometimes the person that claims you're wrong, is the very wrong. Sometimes the person that claims your actions or words says you are ill, is the
very ill. Does not the wickedly ill seek to damn you in a damning care they claim is for your own good to help you stop being you so that you can be
forced into being their puppet that thinks and acts the way they want you to?
[edit on 22-9-2008 by Mabus]