It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thesun
What i am saying is that science can not claim the uinverse is only 13/14 billion years old and at the same time claim that energy can not be created or destroyed, it only changes form. If the energy that created the uinverse had been around before the big bang, then it only just changed form and it was not and could not have been created at the moment of the big bang.
Originally posted by thesun
What i am saying is that science can not claim the uinverse is only 13/14 billion years old and at the same time claim that energy can not be created or destroyed, it only changes form. If the energy that created the uinverse had been around before the big bang, then it only just changed form and it was not and could not have been created at the moment of the big bang.
What was there before the Big Bang and what is there outside of our universe?
We can define the universe as everything there is, so in that case there is nothing outside of it. We also say that space and time both started at the Big Bang and therefore there was nothing before it.
Another definition for the universe is the observable universe - which is the part of it that we can technically see. We cannot know what is outside of that (since we can't observe it), but we think that physics works the same everywhere and so we think that it should be very similar to the observable universe. We actually think that the universe might be infinite in extent, and so goes on forever, even though we can only see a finite part of it.
We can speculate in meta-physics or in religion about what was before the Big Bang, but again, we cannot use science to tell anything about it as physics as we understand it breaks down at that point.