It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But you said no-one alive KNEW what they looked like.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Considering he was an Apostle of Christ and Christ raised them from the dead, of I dunno....
Wasn't jesus supposed to have been 'dead' at this point? Plus there is no mention of Matthew even being at the crucifixion so he would have had a hard job speaking to jesus about this
perhaps Jesus INTRODUCED THEM???
Matthiew: "Hey Jesus, who are those dudes with you?"
Jesus: "Don't worry about it Matthiew."
Matthiew: "Oh, okay."
Nowhere in the scripture does it tell us who these saints were, who saw them, what happened to them, were they naked or did they get dressed up for the occasion. Did they rebury themselves or just magically disappear? You can assume all you like but there is no scriptural evidence to back up your claim that they weren't zombie like.
Secondly, your assuming they had 'half-decomposed bodies". Nowhere in the scripture does it say that, I'd assume they had incorruptible, glorified, resurrected bodies just like Jesus did.
I've never met a Christian who thought Jesus resurrected them as they were without changing their bodies just like his.
Originally posted by shihulud
Whats with these double posts???
[edit on 14-9-2008 by shihulud]
As far as I'm aware it was some unknown as Matthew(the author) never refers to himself(matthew). Confused yet? Plus if it was Matthew why use Mark(who didn't know jesus) to concoct his story - wasn't he there?
Originally posted by moocowman
reply to post by shihulud
This is all so confusing,
So there were dead people walking (or floating, whatever) around Jerusalem, a town population not many? No one actually sees or hears of these dead people except Matthew.
In all the confusion I forgot, was Matthew a real person ? Did matthew write any books or is the book attibuted to Matthew penned by author unknown?
Plus no one knew who these dead people were or what happened after they 'arose'- isn't it great how such a spectacular miracle such as this has only one line in the bible
These dead people, allthough they climbed out of their graves were not decomposed? Yet how could anyone know if they were decomposed or not if, as is alledged no one saw them?
Well we have 3 accounts, 2 from Luke and one from Paul/Saul/Darth Maul himself - Lukes accounts have the companions hearing the voice but not seeing the light THEN seeing the light but not hearing the voice (confused yet?) and Paul making no mention of such an event at all (I'm confused.com)
Didnt a similar thing happen with Paul? Was it not the case that he had never met jesus or knew anything about him?
Until that is one day he sees a ghost claiming to be Jesus ?
Not just children, the scary thing is adults believe it too
This christianity is really funking insane looking, they teach this drivel to little children !!!!!
Or even watch Sesame St, instead of listening to religious drivel they might actually learn how to spell and add up.
Perhaps the chidlren of christians would develop a faculty of reasoning at a far highere level, if they were to watch John carpenter movies every Sunday, or visit a spritualist church.
Originally posted by shihulud
As far as I'm aware it was some unknown as Matthew(the author) never refers to himself(matthew). Confused yet? Plus if it was Matthew why use Mark(who didn't know jesus) to concoct his story - wasn't he there?
Well we have 3 accounts, 2 from Luke and one from Paul/Saul/Darth Maul himself - Lukes accounts have the companions hearing the voice but not seeing the light THEN seeing the light but not hearing the voice (confused yet?) and Paul making no mention of such an event at all (I'm confused.com)
PS Hey noobfun Vampires was better than most blood sucking drivel but you can't beat Halloween.
?HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA just make sure you insist its taught in science like a religeon should be!
Originally posted by moocowman
reply to post by noobfun
www.belowtopsecret.com...
Link for yoda, this thread seemed to die a death unfortunately. I was dissaponted not to have had a longer discussion on it, especially considering that Jedi is now classed as a religion.
I would be nice to see this subject being taught in schools as the jedi seem to have a far higher moral standard than the murderous nutcase god of abraham.
I don't know if i could love Yoda with all my heart and soul but that funking Natalie Portman is ceratinly far more organic than viagra
Never mind the teaching as a religion. Natalie Portman hmmmm breakfast, lunch and dinner
Originally posted by noobfun
?HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA just make sure you insist its taught in science like a religeon should be!
Originally posted by moocowman
reply to post by noobfun
www.belowtopsecret.com...
Link for yoda, this thread seemed to die a death unfortunately. I was dissaponted not to have had a longer discussion on it, especially considering that Jedi is now classed as a religion.
I would be nice to see this subject being taught in schools as the jedi seem to have a far higher moral standard than the murderous nutcase god of abraham.
I don't know if i could love Yoda with all my heart and soul but that funking Natalie Portman is ceratinly far more organic than viagra
Originally posted by shihulud
Never mind the teaching as a religion. Natalie Portman hmmmm breakfast, lunch and dinner
Originally posted by noobfun
Originally posted by shihulud
Never mind the teaching as a religion. Natalie Portman hmmmm breakfast, lunch and dinner
just dont make her an eternal virgin and ruin it for the rest of us k?