It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
What I want is a remote control for my kid....
And my wife!
The one I have doesn't work.
I've tried.
Especially the mute button.
Originally posted by Dan Tanna
You see how the sheeple are willing to give up their freedoms because of illusional fears?
Oh how those in power make the puppet dance to their tunes.
nor any thing else that lets the scum at the top watch them 24 / 7.
Originally posted by Misfit
Um, hello? Turn on ........ turn off.
A little carry gadget that shows me where my kid is ..... and I'm sheeple, that's friggen funny.
Originally posted by thirdeyeflight
It seems like the good thing to do but come on don't take the childs right to privacy away before he/she even gets to use it.
Originally posted by Misfit
Originally posted by thirdeyeflight
It seems like the good thing to do but come on don't take the childs right to privacy away before he/she even gets to use it.
The childs rights? We are talking about knowing where your child is, not putting a camera in the bathtub fer cripes sakes. This device is not embedded into the kids brain stem, it's carried on their person, it turns off.
Destroying our children? Oh man you've got it bad. I take it you don't have kids.
"..A 2005 patent application by American Express itself describes how
RFID-embedded objects carried by shoppers could emit "identification
signals" when queried by electronic "consumer trackers." The system
could identify people, record their movements, and send them video ads..
In 2002, Fleishman-Hillard produced another report for the industry
that counseled RFID makers to "convey (the) inevitability of
technology," and [b]to develop a plan to "neutralize the opposition," by
adopting friendlier names for radio tags such as "Bar Code II" and
"Green Tag."..."
Originally posted by Misfit
Originally posted by thirdeyeflight
It seems like the good thing to do but come on don't take the childs right to privacy away before he/she even gets to use it.
The childs rights? We are talking about knowing where your child is, not putting a camera in the bathtub fer cripes sakes. This device is not embedded into the kids brain stem, it's carried on their person, it turns off.
Destroying our children? Oh man you've got it bad. I take it you don't have kids.
Originally posted by roadgravel
reply to post by Dan Tanna
Because in today's world there are sick people who snatch children in the park. It looks like if a child become out of sight this device help locate them. The only person with the other end is the parent. Someone doesn't call a center and get information.
I feel badly for kids today as they cannot necessarily run the neighborhood and bayou like I did when young. To many sick people walking around waiting to prey on children.
Cell phone tracking tracks the current position of a cell phone. To locate the phone, it must be turned on[1] but does not require an active call. GSM localisation is then done by triangulation based on the signal strength to nearby signal masts.[2]
Federal officials are routinely asking courts to order cellphone companies to furnish real-time tracking data so they can pinpoint the whereabouts of drug traffickers, fugitives and other criminal suspects, according to judges and industry lawyers.