The critical argument against the controlled demolition of the WTC is that the amount of prep-work and synchronization required to pull it off would
be impossible. Explosives need to be strategically placed at numerous specific points at locations all over the building. Also, controlled demo
requires that large chunks are removed from the key load bearing members to reduce redundancy and ensure that the entire structure is already on the
verge of collapse. Obviously, the science required to bring about such a massive undertaking is beyond comprehension. Nobody could do that without
large teams of people working all over the building, sure to be noticed!!
And since, controlled demo is impossible, the only explanation is that a plane severed about 1/3 of the columns over 3-5 floors and the resulting
low-heat fires further weakened this already damaged steel over this same 3-5 floor area. And once this section was primed for collapse, all you had
to do was initiate it and the entire building spontaneously tears itself apart.
So, which is it? Is the building prone to completely shred itself apart with little additional help, or does the collapse require large amounts of
concentrated energy specifically pinpointed at strategic load bearing members.
Quite frankly, neither sounds that plausible... So what are we to believe? Space-based energy beams on satellites that are using advanced scalar
plasmatic mirroring to simultaneously target a building from space by instantly
dissolving the entire structure into a fine dust?
Clearly, that sounds totally bat# crazy! But wait, what is this?! It looks like this guy has developed a methodology for using a household microwave
as a foundry!
home.c2i.net...
home.c2i.net...
home.c2i.net...
Is it possible that a similar methodology could be employed in a building demolition? Using directed energy from high powered microwave emitters,
wired into the buildings electrical system, is it possible to focus so much energy into the hollow box-columns over a course of about an hour and
weaken large sections of the building, bringing it to the brink of implosion? Like using a magnifying glass to roast ants with sunlight, using
precision focus to knock-out critical structural redundancies?
No, of course not. No such thing would ever occur.
[edit on 8/18/2008 by sp00n1]
[edit on 8/18/2008 by sp00n1]
[edit on 8/18/2008 by sp00n1]