The North Side Flyover - Officially Documented, Independently Confirmed

reply to post by gavron


gavon, you are 100% right. Ultima constantly pulls this crap. He wont give the contact info because his whole charade would be exposed and we would find out he is just a janitor or security guard at the NSA.(if even that) The guy is a pathological liar. Like the fact he saw the document. He never saw any document. He read it from another website and acts like he uncovered some important information. He wants people to think he is important. He brags about how he works for the NSA. Nobody does this about their jobs. I have never witnessed this behaviour on any forum. It really is quite pathetic.

reply to post by ULTIMA1


Apparently you are afraid that you have broken an NSA policy, since you are too scared now to provide the contact information to TY like you said you would.

Why did you say you would provide contact information then?

[edit on 18-9-2008 by gavron]

reply to post by gavron


This guy is seriously insane. If you want a good laugh read me arguing with him about the e4b over washington. He has some real good rebuttals.
here is the link. DEBATING THE E4B OVER DC WITH ULTIMA :LOL:

Originally posted by gavron
Apparently you are afraid that you have broken an NSA policy, since you are too scared now to provide the contact information to TY like you said you would.

But i have just proven i did not break policy, can you even read or do you need help?

Why can't you be adult enough to admit when you have been proven wrong?

Originally posted by tide88
This guy is seriously insane.

Thanks for porving my point about you and believers by having to change topics when proven wrong.

reply to post by ULTIMA1


So you only lied when you said you would provide contact information then?

Why did you offer to provide the contact information, then when asked, you now refuse?

Originally posted by gavron
Why did you offer to provide the contact information, then when asked, you now refuse?

Why can't you be adult enough to admit when you have been proven wrong?

reply to post by ULTIMA1


So you only lied when you said you would provide contact information then?

Why did you offer to provide the contact information, then when asked, you now refuse?

Originally posted by gavron
Why did you offer to provide the contact information, then when asked, you now refuse?

Thanks for showing again you cannnot be adult enough to admit when you are proven wrong.

reply to post by ULTIMA1


Thanks again for showing everyone here that you lied when you said you would provide contact information then.

Why did you offer to provide the contact information, then when asked, you now refuse?

Originally posted by gavron
Why did you offer to provide the contact information, then when asked, you now refuse?

Why should i give out information when i am insulted and cannot get people like you to be adult enough to admit when you have been proven wrong?

reply to post by ULTIMA1


So you lied then when you posted on this forum that you would provide ThroatYogurt the contact information?

I can link your post again if you like...so you can see i'm not twisting your words.

Just wanting to make sure I understand correctly.



[edit on 18-9-2008 by gavron]

Originally posted by gavron
Just wanting to make sure I understand correctly.

Just want to make sure i understand correctly that you will not admit to being proven wrong?

reply to post by ULTIMA1


You havent proevn anything wrong.

In order to prove me wrong, you would have had to have given ThroatYogurt your contact information.

Since you havent done that, that means you lied when you said you would.

Thanks for proving that

Originally posted by gavron
You havent proevn anything wrong.

But i did prove you wrong about breaking a policy. Why can't you be adult enought to admit it?

reply to post by ULTIMA1


You havent proven it wrong. In order to prove it wrong (about breaking the policy), you were going to provide ThroatYogurt contact information so he could confirm it with your boss.

You have chickened out and not provided that information, because you know not it DID violate policy (by revealing on a public forum part of a classified document).

You "say" that what you talked about wasnt the classified part, but the document in whole is considered classified.

face it, you posted information here from a classified document, and now fear for your supposed NSA job....so taht is why you are too afraid to provide contact information for your boss.

Originally posted by gavron
You havent proven it wrong.

Yes i have proven it wrong. I have proven that media sites have posted the information i have posted.

So are you saying the media has also broke policy?

[edit on 18-9-2008 by ULTIMA1]

reply to post by ULTIMA1


No, I am saying YOU have yet to post the document you said you saw.

Unless you are saying that Media sites have access to the same "classified" documents you do, but actually do post what they say they would.

Sometimes it becomes plainly obvious why most "truthers" are not now and will never be taken seriously.

Srsly, if you want to get your point across, acting like a three year old saying "NUH UH YOU'RE A POOPY HEAD!!!!!!" is the worst way to go about doing so.

Originally posted by gavron
Unless you are saying that Media sites have access to the same "classified" documents you do, but actually do post what they say they would.

Can you read ? The media site posted the same thing that i stated about the document. So are you saying that the media also broke policy, YES or NO ?

Please read the following carefully or have someone read it to you.

onlinejournal.com...

The shoot-down of United 93 is backed up by evidence in U.S. intelligence files, including those found in the super-classified CRITIC database maintained by the National Security Agency (NSA).