It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Problems Arising with Disclosure

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 1 2008 @ 12:57 PM
link   
I came up with some of the problems that Disclosure would have on societies and the general population. I know that there is more (and feel free to add them), but by seeing the multi-facets of issues that would arise makes it easier to understand why governments/leaders might be so opposed to the idea of disclosure... until the last possible moment.

Alien Abductions
- ...will be realized as actually taking place. The negative connotations involved with this phenomena will cause distress for some. Though the experiencers are now beginning to realize that the visitors are not here to harm or suppress us, rather the opposite seems to be the agenda. But only after the experiencer comes out of denial, releases the blockage and comes to terms with the concept and reality of what is taking place in their lives. That there is more to life than merely our physical makeup.


Lies Told by Governments
- How will the people of the world take in the fact that the government institutions of the world have kept this from being common knowledge? Anger and resentment is sure to arise as the people of the world will know it as fact their long held distrust over “Big Brother”.
- And what of the technology received through political communion with the visitors? What if it became knowledge that free-energy devices were available all along to help the Earth’s pollution problems as well as the positive effects such a technology would bring to the poor and third world countries.
- Pardons will be a requirement of Disclosure. Too many ‘insiders’ and whistleblowers would be subject to criminal charges if Disclosure was made without prior agreements and arrangements of Pardons towards people violating the law as instructed by superiors. Pardons will also be a necessity in Disclosure, for that would ensure the most accurate testimony from the participants either knowingly or unknowingly involved in any illegal activities associated with this agenda. The only ones who will not have opportunities of Pardon are human rights violators and others who knowingly took the life of another intelligent entity.
- Contactee Jim Sparks was the first to propose the offering of Pardons as a means to allow the Truth to more easily come forward.

Spiritual Revelation
- Disclosure would bring massive disruptions in religious beliefs when it becomes known of the spiritual nature of all living beings. That God is not a figurehead, but rather a neutral force that permeates and is all of Reality.
- Souls exist! What will this do to a global society? It would unite all, but power hierarchies will disseminate and world legal systems will implode. All men are created equal will not be just a catch phrase, but a truth of existence.


Paranormal Properties
- Paranormal phenomenas will manifest and become part of the human condition. They will be slow to occur in the beginning, but will gradually increase as knowledge of how to attain such properties will proliferate. This includes the mind bending concept that there are indeed alternative realities, whether they are called ‘hyperdimensional’, ‘higher density’, or ‘alternative universes’.
- The knowledge that telepathy is a real occurrence will be known. Communication methods of higher evolved entities are mainly done through telepathy. Not by words or sentences, but by a universal system of symbolism and archetypes, much of which are inherent in the structural foundation of the Cosmos. Intelligent beings, including humans, have the capability to transform these symbols and archetypes into the language the entity understands. This is a function of the spirit merging consciously with mind and body.


There is a major fallacy in human contextualization concerning suspicions of other intelligent beings living in this universe with us. It is an understandable fallacy as we have felt all alone for the majority of our physical existence, with the possible exceptions of religious and spiritual events, though most would argue that those would lie outside the physical. The fallacy? We are not taking into context the possible (and I would argue ‘most likely’) transcendental nature of advanced beings. Humans have a strong tendency to always pull everything down to our level of interaction, even though we have strong suspicions that ETs or advanced beings would have had to evolve past a specific point of psychological stability in order to get beyond devolution by aggressive actions or debilitating societal structures. The absolute need for advanced beings to get beyond the Fear stage – Third Density – of sentient evolution is a requirement. The temptation to use evolving technologies as weapons of mass destruction would be overwhelming in a Fear Stage civilization. Eventually all intelligent life-forms come to this juxtaposition: To psychically evolve past the illusory nature of fear, or continuously evolve/devolve in the endless spiral that ignorance inhabits.



posted on Aug, 1 2008 @ 01:24 PM
link   
I definitely feel that elites want the technology but not the help or opinion of ET's, so they figure keep it hush hush and soon we will have the technology and control of the earth....but I think ET's are smarter than our filthy elite's
And I want to meet them and I want to exchange ideas and knowledge about our past, present and future. Imagine if these ET's knew the truth about the illuminati and the Zionist agenda and were willing to discuss it with us and help us....where would that leave these parasitical elites? If they are stopping our missiles from functioning then they can be my friends any day and they know it.



posted on Aug, 1 2008 @ 04:38 PM
link   
reply to post by bubbles75
 


Right in line with my thoughts. I guess that is probably the going consensus. "sure we'll take the tech! No, we are spiritually advanced enough, trust us!"



posted on Aug, 2 2008 @ 12:41 PM
link   
And I wonder if pardons is a viable answer in getting disclosure started. I guess it would depend on the type of laws broken by those in charge of the cover-up, and if they (the ones accused of the crime) knowingly committed the crimes.

Would pardons sit well with the people? I, for one, would gladly accept that trade-off; handing out pardons for disclosure! If there were a poll taken to that affect, I bet it would lean heavily in favor of forgiving crimes if we were to finally know the truth.




top topics
 
0

log in

join