How would you plan and implement the NWO?

Hello everyone!

Personally, I think that a global government/community is beneficial and essential to our survival as a species. However, the current NWO in execution I think is the wrong way to do it, or at least the objectives are immoral.

Now here's what I would like to have your summarized input on.

If you were an influencial and powerful member of society working with a select few to plan and implement a NWO, what would it be like?

1) How would you implement it? That is, would it be through totally peaceful means, violence or a combination of both?
2) Would you make it public or keep it on a low profile?
3) Would you chip the population?
4) How would you structure the organization?
5) Would it implement any current political ideologies?
6) Would it adopt a current religion, create a new one or abolish religion all together?
7) Would it seek to consolidate current religions?
8) Would it look for planetary/galactic self-reliance or seek aliances with other civilizations?
9) Would it consolidate current cultural differences and maintain cultural diversity or create a single universal culture?

I hope this thread makes sense to you all, I would really like to have your input on the topic.

1) combination of both
2) Low Profile is better.
3) yes
4) each continent will have its own ruler, but it will act as a messenger . it will inform the people who are in charge of the world.
the structure will be similar to a Greek republic.
5) anarchy, the good stuff of communism, and a kind of Greek republic
6) abolish religion all together
7) no
8) yes
9) culture will be something that you would do in your own house, with your own family, public display of culture is not allow [- unless is in a place, like a bar or something that is aim to your culture -]

[edit on 31-7-2008 by CzErased]

[edit on 31-7-2008 by CzErased]

1) How would you implement it? That is, would it be through totally peaceful means, violence or a combination of both?

Peacefull desagregation of government structures, to be replaced by local governance under an international law, but with no centralized international power structure. It is not needed and serves only as a turd to attract the power flies.

2) Would you make it public or keep it on a low profile?

Public, it has to be wanted without duress.

3) Would you chip the population?

F*** no.

4) How would you structure the organization?

Like I hinted at previously I would not. Paradoxically the only beneficial international structure is a lack of structure. We need a global charter, bill of rights, not a government.

5) Would it implement any current political ideologies?

How could it not? But more important than ideologies it would have to implement ethics based on the do unto others as you would have done unto you meme (and not written by a sadomasochist).

6) Would it adopt a current religion, create a new one or abolish religion all together?

F*** no. F*** no. No. Religion is personal and people should seek their own spirituality. However, religion would be kept away from governance, regardless of it being a majority religion or not.

7) Would it seek to consolidate current religions?

Nope, governance is distinct from religion.

8) Would it look for planetary/galactic self-reliance or seek aliances with other civilizations?

Planetary self reliance kinda makes sense, but if more advanced aliens come here it's not like we can shut the door is it? We have to deal with that reality if it is upon us.

9) Would it consolidate current cultural differences and maintain cultural diversity or create a single universal culture?

Maintain cultural diversity but at the same time have a parallel global culture. But not this western world neo fascist militaristic masturbational ego trip. Something that would come out of humanity learning from it's mystakes and it's history. This would be a work in progress.

But more important than all of the above we have to address the fundamental injustice of our civilization, which is a tiny minority of the population on paper owning most of the wealth. This absolutely has to be addressed and their reluctance to give up their social positions is a threat both to the survival of the general population and their own.

Originally posted by SeekIllumination
Hello everyone!

My term for my government is Democratic Black Dicitatorship here is why.

1) How would you implement it? That is, would it be through totally peaceful means, violence or a combination of both?

It's a combination of both, to right economics, further impoverishment must be harshly opposed. The poor will riot when completely stripped of benifits usually supplied by a government. The peace is the replacement of soldiers with more educated people or like cultured misfits.

2) Would you make it public or keep it on a low profile?

Public, it is the cure.

3) Would you chip the population?

If i understand the new term correctly, the off load of undesired people is the diplomatic edge. Exchange criminal minded for educated and productive people. A soft slave trade. Illegal immigrancy can be curbed by the requirements for entrance. Example: 15K in finances and a college education. Zero population growth proposed in a manner of education. Parents are required to have college degrees before having children. If "welfare" benifits were required after the age of five the child would have to remain in school and have at least a "C" average.

4) How would you structure the organization?

The trouble is in just that. Every law is to be broken. Some perk must be gained. However, It is a governmental shift from the war industry to direct funding of education. Instead of corporations backing the war industry they will back Educational institutes who's bureaucracy will guide the society back into the proper morality to base further education upon. Education there fore will lead to ingenuity and there fore the ability for greater prosperity.

5) Would it implement any current political ideologies?

Obviously one's own country has trouble. Here in america this replaces the office of the president. G. Washington was self appointed. The executive powers of this office need to be maintained for the ability to direct human social growth without an act of congress. The people still have an oversight with the congress. The office is named for the type of style government. Any ethnicity could hold the office and understand it's use. The office of the president is uniquely democratic, G. Washington made a fast moved to become unbound by the Const. Congress. It can become that belief from the populous that, that is the standard voice(all people) of the people toward the congress.

6) Would it adopt a current religion, create a new one or abolish religion all together?

It would be able to support all beliefs with it's greater educational demands.

7) Would it seek to consolidate current religions?(see 6)

8) Would it look for planetary/galactic self-reliance or seek aliances with other civilizations?

It would rely on other civilizations for soft slave trade importing education and wealth while off loading the unprogrammable. Unfortunately, in this world commodities trade evenly. There are shortages. The essentials will only be of significance. I believe that food growers will probably be major investers of the soft slave trade. Illegal or migrant workers replaced with the unprogrammable.

9) Would it consolidate current cultural differences and maintain cultural diversity or create a single universal culture?

(see 6)

I hope this thread makes sense to you all, I would really like to have your input on the topic.

It raised no other question than trust , in my NWO, thanks for the query.