Is Your Office Tower

Is it *possible* that WTC7 was pre-wired with demolition explosives, long before September 11, so that in the event of a...major crises...the owner of said building, Larry, could give an order such as "Pull it" resulting in the building miraculously falling down? Like it did.

If demolition explosives were indeed placed in WTC7, perhaps it is not a stretch of the imagination to suggest Larry bought a special package deal for his other, recently purchased, buildings across the street?

Perhaps the habit of secretly pre-wiring buildings for demolition isn't so uncommon?

Perhaps, owing to the complexities of constructing tall buildings, ordinary construction workers are not fully aware of what every 'thing' they are installing actually 'does'?

Perhaps the building you work in, or live in, is pre-wired?

How would you know it isn't?

Interesting topic.

This was raised (sort of) in a very recent BBC Documentary: "The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 - The Third Tower".

They examined the possibility of shaped charges being built into the building. As several architects and engineers said: the outer walls had no reason to collapse the way they did due to to fire (they were not directly subjected to the heat of any fires in the same way you could argue the interior walls were) and thus they had to be brought down.

Together with the way it came down (pretty much vertically, as witnessed by the non-movement/buckling of the corners as it fell) suggests something other than fire/structural failure was the cause.

Many architects/engineers think the same. They're not all nuts.

One guy in the film (located in the Netherlands), was shown WTC7 falling, but was not told what it was, or when it was taken. He said without hesitation that he thought it was a demolition (he actually re-iterated that it looked like a classic demolition). He was visibly shocked when he was told that it was WTC7 on 9/11. He initially didn't believe the crew who showed him the video. He looked quite shocked when he realized they were serious.

When you start getting architects and engineers (usually considered very rational, scientifically-minded people) asking serious questions, you know there is a problem.

If you need any proof that existing governments would lie, just look at Iraq and the false premise of WMD and assassinations of prominent scientists that spoke out against their existence. If that doesn't convince you, then you don't want to face up to reality.

[edit on 28-7-2008 by mirageofdeceit]

Originally posted by mirageofdeceit



Many architects/engineers think the same. They're not all nuts.



When you start getting architects and engineers (usually considered very rational, scientifically-minded people) asking serious questions, you know there is a problem.

And here is co- founder of Architects and Engineers 4 911 truth Richard Gage explaining the collapse of the WTC Towers:

Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
And here is co- founder of Architects and Engineers 4 911 truth Richard Gage explaining the collapse of the WTC Towers:

If you (and others) actually believe that Gage is explaining the collapse of the towers with those card board boxes, I can see why you (and others) believe the official story. He's explaining what is called resistance (conservation of momentum). And no amount of goofy "twoofy" music in the background will change this fact.

Although, I agree that it's not a really good comparison to make.

Now, NIST building several floors worth of replica of the towers and setting them on fire with very little deflection would be a better comparison IMO.