posted on Jul, 27 2008 @ 10:04 AM
I think there's a perceptual disconnect, between how US citizens see their political system, and how the world sees the motivations and actions of US
foreign-policy.
Citizens in the US think of each 4-year election as a potential political 'clean sweep', creating distinct boundaries and discontinuities between
the policies of successive administrations.
Outside the US, much more continuity is perceived. A 'larger pattern' of behaviour is seen, with motivations and methods that transcend the
rhetoric of any one particular political party or Presidency.
The US history of foreign interventionism, from the middle of the 20th century through today, is a larger tapestry of agenda and motivation --
although the actions of the Bush administration may, to many, obviously underscore the more objectionable aspects of that motivating ideology, it
would be foolish to assume that a simple election, or even impeachment of an individual or administration, would cause that to radially change in
practice.
The proof of actual change would be in establishing a new pattern of actions. Without that, political hot-air and theater is just another
meaningless diversion.