Real Investigation Vs show: Raising the Kursk compared to 9/11 Commission

A real investigation looks to solve the problem by assessing the events in a deductive way...a+b=c SALVAGE OF PIECES TO RECREATE FAILURE+ACCURATE ASSESMENT OF EVIDENCE IN HAND=FACTUAL REPRESENTATION OF PRECIPITATING EVENTS AS DESCRIBED
The Scenes:
Kursk entombed for 14 months 360ft below the surface of the Barents sea. The most dangerous salvage operations to date, requiring many disciplines across numerous countries and seas.en.wikipedia.org...
9/11 with in a major US city, our backyard if you will. Not underwater, readily accessable with ability to collect evidence of situaiton IMMEDIATELY. Yet it took the offical Commission 441 days to 'open' and begin looking into the worst tragety in American History. By this time the evidence was destroyed and itself "history!"en.wikipedia.org...
Kursk was one submarine failure
9/11 failures:CIA intelligence, Bush Administration, FBI survelance of ATTA failed, Norad failed, Airport Security Failed, Three Steel Framed Buildings Fail due to fire: First in engineering History, Chemistry and Physics fail to preform as normally predicted, Pentagon Defense system mysteriously fails, WMD in Iraq Failures, Commission fails to include truth of WTC 7 Collapse.
Basically everything that could fail did that day according to The Offical report and explanation, so why the feet dragging when it comes to uncovering the truth?
You'd think that with so many areas of complete incompetence that someone would get fired and their asses kicked for such a tragedy to happen!! But most got Raises and Promotions for a Job well screwed up, great job at killing fellow americans!!!
Money and time spent:
Kursk $100 milliion plus and 18months on the bottom of the oceasn floor, RASING THE INVESTIGATION!
community.seattletimes.nwsource.com...
www.aeronautics.ru...
9/1114 million and 2 years, in a room behind closed doors, editing out what cannot be included, well that isn't factual now is it? Omitting information pertaining to explanations and cause of such a terrible incident.
www.unknownnews.net...
Conclusions:
Kursk: Raising the truth was worthy enough to risk despite the Nuclear reactor, cruise missles!!! Risked more lives in going to the bottom of the ocean and raising the wreakage of a sunken submarine, thus finding out the actual causes of the ONE SUB FAILURE. Major set backs and weather hindered the slavage operations, it took many months to get the recovered vessel home but they weere successful in doing so.
With 9/11: the evaluation was show, like a bad comedy the joke was on the American people that believe that the 9/11 commission was actually an investigation, but more away to make sure that smoking guns and evidence like WTC 7 would be plain avoided and never brough up at all with anything the government was investigating. They never assessed the site, never collected any evidence from the scene, or looked at mounting suggections from the photographic and witness record regarding "explosions." Not a single shread of proof was included about anything regarding 9 /11 and the MSM explaination, just myth and fables of the time line and failures of buildings unprecidented in history till that date. Even the hijacked Airline flight manifests, are incorrect being re-issued over and over with major inconsistencies and not one having the name of the hijackers on them.In closing remarks that would be like the Russians saying to their country, Kursk? What Kursk? We have no idea or recall what you are talking about. As Houdini once said, "What the Eyes' see and the Ears hear, the mind believes!" Kursk raising was serious inquery investigation, by shear actions alone have shown.

9/11???

[edit on 24-7-2008 by theability]