It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cyberbian
The most disqualifying fact is the speed the object would need to have moved at if at ten miles range. 100 time the acceleration to kill a man.
This dosen't prove superior alien technology, it proves gullability, and a desire to explain away the impossability. I guess the doctors grant ran out, and he was left hawking UFO reports to South American TV.
Originally posted by kaffemoka
Originally posted by Cyberbian
The most disqualifying fact is the speed the object would need to have moved at if at ten miles range. 100 time the acceleration to kill a man.
This dosen't prove superior alien technology, it proves gullability, and a desire to explain away the impossability. I guess the doctors grant ran out, and he was left hawking UFO reports to South American TV.
Impossibility? For humans, now...
We are only capable of imagining things that we can create. Consider what we will be able to do if the human race lives another million years. What technology might exist for us then? If another race is a million years more advanced than us, why couldn't they travel at that speed? This also assumes that a biological entity is piloting, one that is capable of dying. 1 million year-future me probably send a robot of some sort...
Originally posted by JDN24
First, we have no proof that it was a "rocket".
Originally posted by Cyberbian
The most disqualifying fact is the speed the object would need to have moved at if at ten miles range. 100 time the acceleration to kill a man.
This dosen't prove superior alien technology, it proves gullability, and a desire to explain away the impossability. I guess the doctors grant ran out, and he was left hawking UFO reports to South American TV.
Originally posted by Cyberbian
The most disqualifying fact is the speed the object would need to have moved at if at ten miles range. 100 time the acceleration to kill a man.
This dosen't prove superior alien technology, it proves gullability, and a desire to explain away the impossability. I guess the doctors grant ran out, and he was left hawking UFO reports to South American TV.
Originally posted by Cyberbian
Originally posted by kaffemoka
Originally posted by Cyberbian
The most disqualifying fact is the speed the object would need to have moved at if at ten miles range. 100 time the acceleration to kill a man.
This dosen't prove superior alien technology, it proves gullability, and a desire to explain away the impossability. I guess the doctors grant ran out, and he was left hawking UFO reports to South American TV.
Impossibility? For humans, now...
We are only capable of imagining things that we can create. Consider what we will be able to do if the human race lives another million years. What technology might exist for us then? If another race is a million years more advanced than us, why couldn't they travel at that speed? This also assumes that a biological entity is piloting, one that is capable of dying. 1 million year-future me probably send a robot of some sort...
It is an impossability for humans now, therefore it must be aliens from the future!
Brilliant, but not logic. It is reason turned upside down by the feet for it's skull to be dashed against a rock!
Originally posted by rocksolidbrain
Ok, now use common sense and think which explanation seems more natural. Or stick to the alien war image if it amuses you. But you will miss the bigger mysteries awaiting for you, like the ones of REAL aliens.