New Cigar Shape UFO Pictures

Hi - there are actually some daytime shots of something very similar to this. If it's the same thing, it might dispel the plane and exposure issue?


Jaime Maussan has a been given a lot of videos of these things from skywatchers. And there is one from the 2005 conference where you see one, in daylight, birthing or shedding globes.

I'll try to find the link.

found it - look at around 7:10 into the video for how it makes the spheres. It's cigar shaped and in daylight. Jaime Maussan really gets amazing videos sent in from around the world for Mexico's 60 Minutes (if you haven't yet, check out his 2005 UFO conference collection of footage on youtubes...)








[edit on 7/17/2008 by trusername]

[edit on 7/17/2008 by trusername]

reply to post by The Lizard King


The cylinder looks like it has rings of magnetic field around it.
However these would be electric fields that electrically excite
the atmosphere and the 'dark matter' when powerful enough
from high potential.

Very little current is involved only voltage.

The 'gravitational' effects of 'dark matter' must surely be due to
electrical activity among the stars. Iron being of great magnetic
sensitivity seems off that iron the the last heavy element in the
atomic furness of a star. The rich orange landscapes show the
iron seed that created the earth. We might be living on a cinder
of a burnt out star. But the magnetism of iron is interesting.

Tesla was named a measure of high magnetic field yet Tesla
actually made enormous electric fields. Do not be thrown by
the Illuminati and the confusion they say about Tesla.

reply to post by The Lizard King


Sorry everybody for taking so much time to post this, but other things got in the way and I almost forgot about it.

According to the EXIF data, the first photo was taken at 23:15:47.


The second, one minute later, at 23:16:47, was the other photo you posted on the opening post.


The third, 50 seconds after the previous photo, at 23:17:37, was the one you said was an helicopter.

Considering that there was also an helicopter, and the time between photos, are you sure that the light was not any aeroplane(s) taking off from an air-strip or airport? Even the angle reminds me of aeroplanes taking off.

Is there any airport to the right of that city?

This is a prime example of why its useless to even try and take pictures to collaborate eye witness testimony of something that is unusual and can't be explained in a natural way, such as balloon or street light. First, you have the account of what the person saw, and second you have an attempt to photograph it. The testimony is a part of the proof, and should give direction as to the object to some extent or another.

Thank you for submitting these photos, its brave and valiant of you to share them.

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by The Lizard King

 

Sorry everybody for taking so much time to post this, but other things got in the way and I almost forgot about it.

According to the EXIF data, the first photo was taken at 23:15:47.


The second, one minute later, at 23:16:47, was the other photo you posted on the opening post.


The third, 50 seconds after the previous photo, at 23:17:37, was the one you said was an helicopter.

Considering that there was also an helicopter, and the time between photos, are you sure that the light was not any aeroplane(s) taking off from an air-strip or airport? Even the angle reminds me of aeroplanes taking off.

Is there any airport to the right of that city?

Look, to cut a long unrewarding effort short there is no point in trying to argue about this photo. Whether it fake or genuine it doesn't help the disclosure of such UFOs.

Remember - we already have millions of photos and videos that are as yet, not proved to be fake.

It's fun analysing these things but as far as the big picture is concerned we need samples from a real downed UFO.

Oh, and there have been countless video taped mass sightings across the world - it hasn't helped stimulate the government but it has given people a more open mind to such things.

Originally posted by Jinni
Look, to cut a long unrewarding effort short there is no point in trying to argue about this photo. Whether it fake or genuine it doesn't help the disclosure of such UFOs.

Disclosure or not, it is always worth it to know the truth, and in this case the only thing we have are these photos.

To me it's important to know if the photos really show an extraordinary craft or just an ordinary one, it will help in hypothetical future events to know how to distinguish between those two types of craft.

Remember - we already have millions of photos and videos that are as yet, not proved to be fake.

But they are not proved to be true either, so while there isn't any classification of true or fake (Why should it be fake? Do you consider a photo of an aeroplane taken by someone who could not identify it a fake?) the value of those photos and videos is null, they cannot be used in favour or against any side of the UFO field.

It's fun analysing these things but as far as the big picture is concerned we need samples from a real downed UFO.

I don't think we need to go that far.

Oh, and there have been countless video taped mass sightings across the world - it hasn't helped stimulate the government but it has given people a more open mind to such things.

An open mind is a good thing, but unfortunately many people in the UFO field look more like someone that changed their mind from one track to the another, they keep their minds closed to other possibilities as they did before accepting the UFO theory.

reply to post by ArMaP


Hi - If you get a chance could you look at my first post above with the daytime video of a similar object. What do you think of that re the camera effect? And the spheres "controlling" the cigar shaped object? Thanks