posted on Jul, 6 2008 @ 06:45 PM
Note to Mods: I do see the threads below, but the links to the "active" threads don't seem to work - I get re-directed to the thread I'm
viewing, and it's locked!
If anyone missed that documentary tonight, it is available on BBC iPlayer. Quite well written I thought and reasonably balanced. I was wondering what
Mr. Dylan Avery might come up with, but I thought what he had to say was quite good. The part where he was confronted about the witness in WTC7 was
fantastic - he produced the original interview and played it back. Someone clearly altered their story after the fact.
I'm not trained in such things particularly, but I take eye-witness testimony recorded at the time to be more accurate than anything said afterwards,
as confusion can set in, people can hear things, memories can be altered etc.. and I personally feel the "record at the time" is likely to be the
most accurate.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
In the film they said that over 390 scientists and engineers world-wide questioned Building 7.
I'm not sure if BBC iPlayer is restricted to UK viewers only, but try it anyway - interesting.
[edit on 6-7-2008 by mirageofdeceit]