I just dont understand

The thing that really ticks me off about the system in america is this.

remember the impeachment of bill clinton?
Ok he had an affair with that monica luinski, fair enough, But was this reason enough to impeach him?

He was was plastered all over mainstream media for months. His famous words

"I did not have sexual relations with this woman"..




Ok he lied thats understandable, but its one white lie.

Then we have his lordship George w bush who has lied hundreds of times about things a million times more dangerous, not to mention his responsiblity for the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent people. HE'S STILL IN OFFICE. Why isnt he out of office?

Now we have bush lies..



What is wrong with this picture?

Ah, you know why. Slick Willy Clintoon lied under oath. Only when you're under oath must you tell the truth. At all other times you may lie. It's the American way.

Ever crossed your mind that they are all in this together? They are all cold-hearted reptiles.

Bill Clinton's gross inaction in reacting to terrorism led directley to 9/11. All Bush is doing is cleaning up Clinton's mess.

A White lie? You obviously don't understand National Security. What if China used extorsion to gain weapons system advances? OK it didn't happen exactly that way, China just used campaign contributions to get the information. But it could have easily happened the other way.

Because sex issues are IMMORAL, terrible and UNGODLY! His holiness, Bush the II, is doing his best to defend us from the EVIL terrorists who threaten our way of life, our Christian morals! Praise his name! Bless Bush!

Hang on... the drugs are wearing off... Need a quick fix, be right back...
*reads the bible* There we go! Feel better now! Praise Bush!

Get my drift?

the reason the reports came out that there were no "WMD'S" was it was still classified. come off your liberal high horse those in the real world are waiting for you..



www.foxnews.com...

Originally posted by RRconservative
Bill Clinton's gross inaction in reacting to terrorism led directley to 9/11. All Bush is doing is cleaning up Clinton's mess.

That's completely wrong. Bill Clinton and the CIA had plans to assasinate all the key leaders in Al Quaeda. He passed these plans, along with much intelligence, on to George Bush when he took office. Bush failed to act. Then 9/11 happened.

Originally posted by Sestias

Originally posted by RRconservative
Bill Clinton's gross inaction in reacting to terrorism led directley to 9/11. All Bush is doing is cleaning up Clinton's mess.

That's completely wrong. Bill Clinton and the CIA had plans to assasinate all the key leaders in Al Quaeda. He passed these plans, along with much intelligence, on to George Bush when he took office. Bush failed to act. Then 9/11 happened.

How was RRconservative wrong when you said the same thing.
You said Clinton made plans but PASSED along these plans to Bush. So as RRconservative said, 'Clintons inaction' is correct, just as you also stated.

If Clinton passed on the plans, he did not act on them right? Plus, it's highly convenient that after 8 years in office Clinton was just about to act but his term ran out. I don't buy it.

Clinton's affair with Lewinsky was attacked because he did not feel that there was a reason to go to war in Iraq that would adequately convince the American public. The elites in DC wanted to finish the Gulf War and they wanted it during Clinton's second term. Gingrich himself made mention to Clinton that he wouldn't look too deeply into the whole Lewinsky thing during a time of war because the country would need political solidarity.

What Gingrich was really saying was, "You can end your presidency with War or Trial - you choose."

Since Bush Jr. gave those in power the war they so desired he is considered a great president. The people in power seek to vest all federal power in the office of the presidency. Nothing furthers that process of centralizing power (ie. socialism) better than a nice war or a depression.

Jon