strange lights on photo..UFO?

last month we were with friends in the town..
we made pics from us and everywhere,
because my friend was over from usa,
and when we got home we viewed the pics
and on one were weird lights,we didnt see it with bare eyes,
only on this photo.dont know what it is so maybe any ideas from you all?
the photo was taken at end of afternoon,no nearby reflecting objects really..so am curious what it could have been..
love xxx


i223.photobucket.com...



[edit on 26/6/08 by sankas]

reply to post by sankas


Is the image in photobucket the original unedited file?

awesome pic! very interesting double orb photo. its obvious to me that there is no reflecting source, looks close enough to have been heard if it were a helicopter. interesting!! congrats

That is what I saw a few years back, only there was just one. It was dusk and it looked like an afterburner but made no noise.

yes this is the original photo,straight from my friends digital camera,
its a amazing sight isnt it!thanks for brainstorming with me
about what it could have been..we didnt see anything when we took photos and on the others wasnt anything showing,also no planes or helicopters in air.

[edit on 26/6/08 by sankas]

Originally posted by LordThumbs
awesome pic! very interesting double orb photo. its obvious to me that there is no reflecting source, looks close enough to have been heard if it were a helicopter. interesting!! congrats

thanks!

Where was this taken from? Inside, outside?

Here it is blown up, for what it is worth

EXIF:
Camera: Kodak Z1285 Zoom Digital Camera
Lens: 7.5 mm (35 mm equivalent: 36 mm)
(Max aperture f/2.8)
Exposure: Auto exposure, Program AE, 1/203 sec, f/2.8, ISO 64
Flash: Auto, Did not fire
Date: May 30, 2008 2:13:20PM (timezone not specified)
(27 days, 9 hours, 37 minutes, 39 seconds ago, assuming an image timezone of US Pacific)

File: 1,024 × 768 JPEG
134,329 bytes (0.13 megabytes) Image compression: 94%
7% crop of the 3,000 × 4,000 (12.0 megapixel) original
%
2% crop of the 3,000 × 4,000 (12.0 megapixel) original


EXIF — this group of metadata is encoded in 14,762 bytes (14.4k)

Aperture Value 2.8
Color Space sRGB
Components Configuration YCbCr
Compression JPEG (old-style)
Contrast Normal
Create Date 2008:05:30 14:13:20
27 days, 9 hours, 37 minutes, 39 seconds ago
Custom Rendered Normal
Date/Time Original 2008:05:30 14:13:20
27 days, 9 hours, 37 minutes, 39 seconds ago
Digital Zoom Ratio 0
Exif Image Size 3,000 × 4,000
Exif Version 0221
Exposure Compensation 0
Exposure Index 64
Exposure Mode Auto
Exposure Program Program AE
Exposure Time 1/200
F Number 2.8
File Source Digital Camera
Flash Auto, Did not fire
Flashpix Version 0100
Focal Length 7.5 mm
Focal Length In 35mm Format 36 mm
Gain Control None
ISO 64
Interoperability Index R98 - DCF basic file (sRGB)
Interoperability Version 0100
Light Source Unknown
Make EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
Max Aperture Value 2.8
Metering Mode Multi-segment
Camera Model Name KODAK Z1285 ZOOM DIGITAL CAMERA
Orientation Horizontal (normal)
Resolution 480 pixels/inch
Saturation Normal
Scene Capture Type Standard
Scene Type Directly photographed
Sensing Method One-chip color area
Sharpness Normal
Shutter Speed Value 1/203
Subject Distance Range Unknown
Thumbnail Length 3,886
White Balance Auto
Y Cb Cr Positioning Centered

[edit on 27-6-2008 by greeneyedleo]

[edit on 27-6-2008 by greeneyedleo]

Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Where was this taken from? Inside, outside?

Here it is blown up, for what it is worth

outside,we walked down the street...can you see anything in it?

Originally posted by sankas

Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Where was this taken from? Inside, outside?

outside,we walked down the street...can you see anything in it?

I believe this is a reflection because the light is cast in an unnatural way. When a light is cut, as you see below, this means that it is projected onto a transparent or reflectable surface, such as glass. The diffusion of the light has a natural degradation, this does not.








[edit on 27-6-2008 by greeneyedleo]

[edit on 27-6-2008 by greeneyedleo]

Its taken inside a car or something else. Its reflection from glass. Look at the top corners of the picture. There you see the effect of having a shading glass, the dark blue shading doesnt appear without a glass layer.

Bunked ..

strange because it was on street,but am appreciating all details and am looking forward to new ideas also!

Originally posted by kidflash2008
That is what I saw a few years back, only there was just one. It was dusk and it looked like an afterburner but made no noise.

did you have chance to make any photo?

Originally posted by sankas
strange because it was on street,but am appreciating all details and am looking forward to new ideas also!

sankas, thank you for sharing the image: it's not a matter of having "ideas" or of having "new ideas"; the image shows a reflection projected to a transparent surface, this is spelled loud and clear by what we see: if someone comes with a "new idea" then probably he/she is lying or has no clue how the light works: every other option would be contrary to the optical physics basics as we know them: in my opinion, you have been provided with the wrong informations about this image, but what we see IS a reflection.
You asked for opinions, here they are: it's a reflection.