It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jerico65
... What about Andrews AFB? Sure, they aren't in downtown DC, but they are close. Could they a target? ...
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Originally posted by jerico65
... What about Andrews AFB? Sure, they aren't in downtown DC, but they are close. Could they a target? ...
Glad you brought that up. Does anyone know what the role of Andrews AFB actually is? Go to their website and look it up. Their role is to protect DC in the event of an air attack.
Do you know how far Andrews AFB is from the Pentagon? I looked it up with my GPS software one time. It's about 16 miles BY CAR. An F-16 taking off from Andrews AFB would barely have time to get it's landing gear up before it would be over the Pentagon. (Exaggerated, but not by much.)
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
It does not seem unreasonable to me that these buildings be evacuated ...or that the occupants at least be ordered to "safe" locations within the building.
Glad you brought that up. Does anyone know what the role of Andrews AFB actually is? Go to their website and look it up. Their role is to protect DC in the event of an air attack.
and why oh why can't we get dick cheney under oath to tell us what order still stands???
Originally posted by Boone 870
[
Let's pretend for a minute that Cheney actually ordered the fighters not to shoot. This would imply that the pilots had authority to shoot down a civilian aircraft over the United States and that just sounds preposterous to me. Someone would have had to give the fighter pilot's permission to fire if Cheney was ordering them not to fire, right?
Well ...no.... it would imply there were fighters or commanders in the area asking if they could shoot down the aircraft and Cheney said no.
The other possible order would be an order allowing pilots and commanders the ability to shoot at their own discretion. It would be a simple matter to verify this order with the Air Force.
Believe me I suffer from no illusions about what Cheney would say..." I don't recall ...etc etc...
Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by Leo Strauss
and why oh why can't we get dick cheney under oath to tell us what order still stands???
If Cheney ordered aircraft not to shoot and allowed the terrorists to hit the Pentagon, what difference would an oath make?
Let's pretend for a minute that Cheney actually ordered the fighters not to shoot. This would imply that the pilots had authority to shoot down a civilian aircraft over the United States and that just sounds preposterous to me. Someone would have had to give the fighter pilot's permission to fire if Cheney was ordering them not to fire, right?
And which fighters was Cheney ordering not to shoot? The F-16s from Langley didn't arrive until well after flight 77 hit.
Another thing about the pentagon defenses is the fact anti aircraft sam batteries are rarely if ever mentioned. I would have thought these would be the first and final line of defense in such a situation.
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Glad you brought that up. Does anyone know what the role of Andrews AFB actually is? Go to their website and look it up. Their role is to protect DC in the event of an air attack.
Do you know how far Andrews AFB is from the Pentagon? I looked it up with my GPS software one time. It's about 16 miles BY CAR. An F-16 taking off from Andrews AFB would barely have time to get it's landing gear up before it would be over the Pentagon. (Exaggerated, but not by much.)
Originally posted by thedman
Prior to 9/11 nobody envisioned
having to shoot down hijacked aircraft.