New Date Order (you heard about the false prophet, what about the false number)

The error starts with 10. How on earth is there a 10 which starts and continues an error pattern since then after 10 there is a 20 and a 30? I'm talking about for a calendar month to begin with. If it didnt start with "0", then how can there be a 10, 20, and 30?

This month (this June) should have these number signs in its 5 weeks:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (1st week)
8,9,11,12,13, 14, 15 (2nd week)
16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23 (3rd week)
24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31 (4th week)
32, 33 (5th week)

^^The number of number places remains. What you thought was a 30 day month is actually a 33 day month. The Friday the 13th you thought was in this month disappeared.

9-11 was actually 9-12. (9+1+2=12, 9+12=21 *under the error of old man that is*)

If it started with 0 then it wouldnt seem right to call the 1st of the month the "0" (like ground zero which is a false phrase by the way to use when it should be ground one because nothing was deleted).

When you count you dont start with "0". No, you start with "1". And if you start with "1", then you should leave out the error that was sown in whole. That error includes every false number that has any "0" in it. Ha, there is no false alphabits cause man couldnt screw that up.

There arent 12 months in a year, there are 13 months in a year when you remove the labeled 10th month from Oct so that it is the labeled 11th month (Oct). December becomes the 13th month.

As for hours, mins, a secs... You do see there is no "0" hour outside army time. But there is a "10" hour that shouldnt be then based on the start. And there is the minute slot that does start with "00" so that the 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 coming in the minute slot are error-free. Well if that can be, then why cant there be a 0 hour slot outside of army time to where the hours would go up to 11 instead of 12?

Look in a dictionary and you do not see "0" defined as a number. So maybe there should be no 0 hour nor 00, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 to come in the minute/sec slots. Man's measurment of moment(s) has a false number pattern sown into it. Modern mankind must strive to correct Old mankind's errors. How about it? Will there be a New Date, Time-Clock, and Count up to etc Order? Or should there be?

I was reading the bible and it came to me about the ten virgins. If the character Jesus used ten in a context, then you can bet it wasnt in the error context that we go by. So it was 0-10 virgins, which means it was 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 of them which is under the man's error meaning there were 11 virgins, but under the fixed error the 0 becomes 1, the 10 brought down in the 9 place becomes 11. Which means 12 is next to the become 11 number. Thus there were 12 virgins (not counted as you would count under man's catchy error pattern either). Since the false prophet is me, it would take me to have knew the false number sown over and over into a pattern of Old man's error. The devil was a murderer from the beginning. The numbers that have been murdered belonged alive in the places where there were any "0" all along.

Any comments or questions relating to this topic?

[edit on 10-6-2008 by Mabus]

By the way^^Notice on the month how 9 was always supposed to be next to 11? Maybe the 9-11 event was a Sign because 9-11 skips the murderer being in place as a false number ("10").

Hail to the New Errorless Order which is to be received in the mind of modern man till modern man materializes it in time-clocks and calendars!

Rev 12
9And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

^^Great dragon ("0") that old serpent ("10") are the false numbers from the beginning. His angels would be the false numbers that follow him (be he "0" or "10" in starting the error) as a pattern of murder.

By the way, the great dragon and the dragon are two different beings when you pay close attention in your reading of Revelation. Both have the name Satan, but one is the false Satan (the devil). The true Satan which was buried under lies by the devil is not wicked at all. The key clue is the word "called".



[edit on 10-6-2008 by Mabus]

how does 9+1+2 = 12 if there is no 10. It should be 13. Same with 9+12, it should be 22 since there is no 20.

Originally posted by Mabus

Any comments or questions relating to this topic?

Could you please state your point in a single paragraph?

I looked through your post and couldn't really discern any evidence of your activity, other than to inform us that you believe 0 should be counted as a digit.

reply to post by ThePiemaker



Glad to pointed that out. You are correct. It slipped me which you can understand since I been used to the error of old man.

Could be something to the 22 and 13 added from the big event date under the errorless order...

Rev 22:13
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.

^^Well we can tell that Alpha, beginning, and first imply "1" which to start with, not "0".

[edit on 10-6-2008 by Mabus]

Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant

Originally posted by Mabus

Any comments or questions relating to this topic?

Could you please state your point in a single paragraph?

I looked through your post and couldn't really discern any evidence of your activity, other than to inform us that you believe 0 should be counted as a digit.

its the same as any of his other posts, rants that go nowhere

oh and tomorrow is the end of 4/11

reply to post by Anti-Tyrant


Zero used as a number makes it the false number. It (and the other false numbers that follow in pattern) must be taken away if we are to correct the old man's error.

0 is not only counted in mathematics, it is vital. Same goes for chemistry, physics, nearly every if not every scientific pursuit. Exponentially, zero is very important.

We don't start at 1 when we count, but we could utilize your method, if, say, we were counting widgets and began with "0, there are 0 widgets culled from the group." then....... 1, I am counting one widget. etc. etc.

I guess I don't see your pattern here. I don't get the connection. Speak to me with math, I'll get it.

reply to post by Mabus


Let me guess, you're saying that zero is a false number because it's value is nothing.

I've heard this argument before somewhere....

Originally posted by argentus
0 is not only counted in mathematics, it is vital. Same goes for chemistry, physics, nearly every if not every scientific pursuit. Exponentially, zero is very important.

We don't start at 1 when we count, but we could utilize your method, if, say, we were counting widgets and began with "0, there are 0 widgets culled from the group." then....... 1, I am counting one widget. etc. etc.

I guess I don't see your pattern here. I don't get the connection. Speak to me with math, I'll get it.

I see what you're saying, but there is always a month upon and always an hour, mintue, and sec upon so therefore there shouldnt be in any "0" in those things in any way. I mean, if it was a period where there is no month or sec or minute or hour, then one could say there are 0 months, 0 secs, 0 minutes, and 0 hours upon the moment. But I cant see that because the time-clock keeps ticking.

0 should be taken out of math, chem, physics, etc. in the start to finish of any count. Before you do a math problem the answer is at 0 because it's in error to where it needs the problem to be solved. Therefore 0 has its place as an error or problem to be fixed or sovled with what can not and must not have false numbering in it since we are meant to move away from the error or problem, not into it more.

When you turn on a calculator you see a "0" appear. That's because it is letting you know it is ready and waiting for you to start an official calculation. A calculator could work without the appearence of a "0" when you turn it on. I mean, to let you know it is ready, it could have a light indicator instead.



[edit on 10-6-2008 by Mabus]

Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant
reply to post by Mabus

 

Let me guess, you're saying that zero is a false number because it's value is nothing.

I've heard this argument before somewhere....

Afirmative.

We start with something from nothing. We dont start with nothing because there is no value there to work with.

reply to post by Mabus


Are you telling me that the $100 bill I have in my hand is really only worth $1? In that case i would be willing to give you $5 for every $100 bill you have in your possesion. Or does it mean that the $100 bill is really worth $122 (skip 10,20,30.....100,101,102,etc.)? Can I really buy $122 of gas for $100?

Originally posted by disgustedbyhumanity
reply to post by Mabus

 

Or does it mean that the $100 bill is really worth $122 (skip 10,20,30.....100,101,102,etc.)? Can I really buy $122 of gas for $100?

Well you must take out any number with "0" and slide in its place the next true number. Wash, rinse, repeat for each false number left that may have moved down in position.

All false numbers must be removed after each is fixed on the lower end in count first.

Remove the 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100 of the so-called $100 bill number, but keep the count of places where a true number should go instead. It would still be worth the same value, but with just a different looking number to read out on it.

After 99 is supposed to come 111. After 999 is supposed to come 1111. Etc.

I dont think there was a year called year "0" by man who looked upon a man made calendar. Before year 1 you would have to count backwards so that infront of year 1 would have to be a year 2 istead of a year 0.

After you remove the whole web of zeros, what would this error year (2008) become number wise when fixed? It would take time to calculate without a calulator. Modern man must be willing to use other crafty means to calculate so that they can fix the error in whatever it is in.

When you were born you should have been born 1 year and counting on.

So what's your errorless age?

Under the error I'm 30. Under the fix up I'm 34. It wouldnt be 33 because I, under the error, started with 0 years old and counting onward instead of 1 years old and counting on.

34 (3+4=7) "The 7 day theory" by 2pac. He also mentioned "the 3 day theory" in a song within the 7 day theory album. Inbetween =7 and +3 would be 4. "IIII" On a bible note: Three days (III) and a whole (I) to the antonym translation of something in Rev 11.

Anyhow, the 11th you thought was the next day got robbed, as in, a 211 (police code) happened so that it was brought/taken away (forth) and so that the next day is the 12th actually under the fix.

So Rev actually goes up to a 24th chapter. It always seemed like something was missing to that book anyway.

Rev 20(fixed: 22):12(fixed: 13):

And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

Antonym translation:

And I saw the living, great and small (or: insignificant), sit (or: lie) after (or: behind) God; and the books were shut: and another book was shut, which is the book of death: and the living were judged in of these persons (or: places) which were written out the books, conflicting (or: withholding, denying, withdrawing) from their plays (or: rests).

^^The book of death is now shut because to read into the book of life you have to remove the murderous zero pattern web in the very bible to the signs.


[edit on 10-6-2008 by Mabus]

Yeah, they did call it ground zero and they did call it 9-11.

^^See the conflict is the works? So that it's non-conflict it fixed wise is ground 1 caused by 9-12.

So all in all, one of the books opened beyond the book of life and book of death is the book of antonyms (for translation). I suppose why it's books with an "s" is because the first book would be the synonyms translation book.

It said were shut which means are opened to the antonym translation in the post above. Yes, the synonyms and antonyms translations are those books. The book call another book is the book of life in the synonym translation while is the book of death in the antonyms translation. It all comes together. And it must be near the end of this earth moment for me to get this far in full truth.

Rev 9:11 (the fixed 12):

And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.

Antonym transalation:

And they lacked a queen under them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name out the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but out the Greek tongue lack her name Apollyon.

^^In another thread I told all I be the Abaddon that's not in a "her" name even though you can pronouce Mabus as though it's a female name to even think it is. bottomless may also be topful pit or topmore pit. I say this because I come as full truth that cant be toppled. Hell, I top all as truth in word. My very words can have any one dealt with if I will it so. Yes, the cowards fear my snares getting into some other's hands outside their's. Ask the devil about me. The devil knows.

And pit is as a victious animal. So the topful/topmore pit sicks on any with truth after truth.

[edit on 10-6-2008 by Mabus]

You cant get to the book of death without looking first into the book of antonyms. The book of antonyms encompasses anything that is to stand in truth (whole, full truth that is). It includes the bible book and goes beyond the bible book. Whole truth has no bound. When you see a CD album case it is as a book of 1 or more books.

You even remember how "All Eyez On Me" by 2pac had it's discs called "book 1" and "book 2".

In the book of antonyms you are to shut the 0 error pattern web if it mentions numbers or has markings of numbers.

And for you who think there can be no truth outside the bible book, let me ask you this... why did the character Jesus say, "I have greater witness than that of John"? St. John the divine (aka John the baptist who bare record mentioned as so in the gospel and as so in Rev) wrote the book of Revelation. Yes, this John is held as a prophet, not that other John who was a brother of someone and an apostle. So dont get it twisted! John the divine had a visit by an angel of the Lord while alive at some point before the crucifiction of the character Jesus and before he (John the divine/baptist) was beheaded. You can behold Revelation as his work for the angel of the Lord. Did not the Lord have more than enough in a legion of angels for a purpose to serve?

Based on antonyms the first week of june should be 1,7,3,4,5,9,2. How? Certain numbers have opposites. The value is the same in worth, it just has a different symbol look to its definition. So "the 7 day theory" is "the 2 day knew". 2Pac = 7Pac (even notice on an album cover to Me Against the World a 7 in light shadowing Pac leaning?) So VII = 2 and II = 7 if we go by roman numerals. 12 (twelve) = 17 (seventeen) and they trade positions as the same symbols just put to different definitions that are their definitions under their antonyms if we're dealing with full truth that numbers are also words with meaning that just also happen to have symbols.

To bible readers: There is no 1000 year period with anyone. 1000 is a false number. Basically a no value (1000) becomes a value (1111). And what is the common factor? Value. There is an obeying with Anti-Christ that is a value period. The exact numer isnt the point, the point is value itself reguardless number combos.