Egyptian statue on mars?

Originally posted by zorgon
Sigh.... not real colors... changed the light... Seems we always disagree on color my friend

No, not real colours. Seeing that in a RGB colour space any image is made of those three components (red, green and blue) and that colour image was made with photos from the infrared, green and blue, it is obvious that the colours are not the same as the real colours.

But I don't understand why post an image that is not the one I posted. Is that supposed to be the real colours? If it is then you can see that those are not the same colours as the colours in "my" image.

No luck yet finding the original color image of the super resolution version but I wrote a letter requesting info on that. As soon as I hear back I will post it... IF it is available... IF I hear back...

As far as I know there is no colour image of the super-resolution version because that super-resolution version was made with 16 (I think it was the number) images, all from the same filter, making a super-resolution image with different filters would make a mixed image, with some detail that is visible in only one of the filters being treated in a different way from those that are visible in all the filters.

I find this 'stuff' interesting... but I am sure you will convince me its just image artifacts...

Maybe they are, maybe not, there are some artifacts on those images, but not all things are image artifacts, what "stuff" do you consider interesting?

Have you tried to see it in the original images (preferably the original IMG files)?

Here is another example of "Dead or ALIVE" Just generally the evolutional shift favors smaller animals,vs the older larger(like dinosaurs) fossils. This is a similar pattern to Earth animal evolution. Here's an approximate size comparison.Look at the rover tread marks for size and the rover solar panels for size.Look at the tusks and the spaces between the eyes for size. I said in 2004 that the avg animals I was seeing have baseball or softball or grapefruit sized heads.You can review my posts from 2004,4 years ago to see my consistency over the years.Even if you see nothing in my pics,you can read if you are here looking at this and will see that consistency.I mention heads,faces,staring at the rovers.This is not new to me. The rovers and landers are visited by live animals frequently. Many fossils are common from all the Mars sites so far at the surface,yet more and more posters are reporting BLURRING of the images nasa delivers. I called it masking 4 years ago. I UNMASK images of life and fossils on Mars. Nasa consistently masked images for the last 4 years.You can call it BLURRING if you want. I call it mass deception also and consider it lying to the people/taxpayers who foot the bill. You don't have to believe ME,because others will have similar findings and present their findings in a more consistent and systematic way,perhaps on their own sites.Many sites will emerge to show these living beings on Mars.

symetry,face,eye holes,rock,sandstone,cliff,nose 2 feet long carving,skilled artists,tools,representational art,male,forehead,long pointed chin,thin nose,thin chin,perfect allignment,Eyes-nose-mouth in perfect proportions.Humanoid Martian.

Originally posted by ArMaP
If it is then you can see that those are not the same colours as the colours in "my" image.

That is correct ... that is why I included the sundial from the same day

Have you tried to see it in the original images (preferably the original IMG files)?

Nope been busy with "Weather Warfare". I will try and look at the IMG's but I have work the next few days so it may take a bit

reply to post by zorgon


Hi Zorgon, I like your vivid colored avatar very cool. Keep up the great work of bringing out the truth about what is on the Earth, Earth's Moon, Mars, Venus, and the rest of the solar system's planets and moons. Rik Riley



[edit on 13-6-2008 by rikriley]

Thanks Rick To bad that Veja never worked out

A lot of comments have been made about the location of the "Statue" on the 'cliff' where it is...

I want to show an Earth counterpart...

Utah Nine Mile Canyon... Petroglyhs

This one had been called "Santa Claus" for obvious reasons..



But what is important here is the SIZE and LOCATION



Utah Petroglyphs


My favorite one from that location is the Serpent exiting the Wormhole But that is another thread. I just wanted to show the comparison that Ancient people did indeed pick very odd and inaccessible places to do their carving.

Out by John's mine there is a huge turtle with no legs carved into the top of a mountain.. you can see it a long way off... This was carved by the Spaniards as a land mark before they left America... I will get a photo this year as it is right behind another Indian head 'natural' rock face



PS anyone familiar with Spanish treasure hunting should have their jaw dragging when they read that

I like this one too...




Looks just like the one on Earth

reply to post by internos


Hmmm a friend told me about this photo after looking about i saw the ones u guys are reffering to however i also saw these two guys?? let me know what you think??

reply to post by zorgon

Thanks ,Zorgon for the cliff colorization.Also I have a rock carving pic from Arizona American Indians/natives that depicts a snake person from the deadly and dangerous underground posted as a warning near caves so they would not be attacked and eaten.I will find it soon. But here is a comparison of a live NARROW face mars being and a carved one in stone.The long nose is the difference.There's a lot of nose variatin on Mars animals,but always central between eyes and mouth like our animals(higher animals).

reply to post by zorgon


More proof that Nasa would never dream of masking images or fooling the public or violating public trust to show what's really there. Unrelated pic just from the same planet,only ALIVE. Not just ROCKS !

Mars Mothra with Mandibles Opportunity Mothra Spirit 2004 Mandibles on Mars Spirit and Opportunity.

Ok so they are just rocks(the ones you see). I see the semi-invisible live faces surounding them. But let's see if the Mars people have faces like ours.Do they have EYES? Yes they have EYES.Do they have a NOSE ? Yes,even though their noses look very different they have a NOSE. Do they have a MOUTH? Yes they eat with their MOUTH. And yes I found the Arizona snake person rock carving.The green lizard is alive on Mars.Top left live mars dragon with semi-human face.Draco skull is most interesting because it's totally a Nasa fake masking job.

Originally posted by zorgon
That is correct ... that is why I included the sundial from the same day

The sundial from Sol 1167?

The images from the sundial on Sol 1167 do not have the three filters needed to create a RGB image, the first Sol that I found with those rocks and the three images needed for a RGB image is Sol 1177, not 1167.

And my image looks better than yours.


The only images from the sundial on Sol 1167 are from filters L2, L5, L6 and L7, and we have images from those filters for the "cape St. Vincent", so we can compare them with the sundial images, but they are useless for knowing the true(ish) colours.

L2+L5+L7



L2+L6+L7



PS: cape St. Vincent (cabo de S. Vicente) is a cape in the south of Portugal.

reply to post by ArMaP


We sometimes see what we want to see or expect to see.Nothing more,nothing less,like good little soldiers in a row.Do not ask questions.Obey orders.Stay within the lines.Speak when spoken to.Faith in authority.Big Brother will take care of all your needs.

reply to post by vze2xjjk


That is supposed to mean what?

I don't know if it is because it is late (almost 2:00 AM here in Portugal) or because I not that much used to English, I only use it here on ATS, but I don't understand what do you mean by that.

Could you explain it a little better, if it is something that I really should be answering? Thanks any way.

Originally posted by ArMaP
And my image looks better than yours.

The difference between YOUR picture and mine is mine is from NASA and I didn't have to mess with creative coloration

reply to post by Bspiracy


Great response mate, this is the previously Anon poster of the message you replied to, your post encouraged me to become an ATS member, as i can now see that the people on this sites have their own ideas and dont neccesarely accept everyone elses reasons for how my idea was flawed.

Thanks!

Now back to the subject... I agree with your statement that there would be a similar life form to us somewhere in another galaxy, although unless your talking about some sort of time warp, or something that i wouldnt comprehend, i would think that over the hundreds of thousands of years, our genetic makeup has changed immensly, solely for the adaptation of this planet. I would assume that other beings on other planets would have extreme differences by now as well, their skin would be much different, due to the nearness of their light/heat source (if there was one at all), their eyes would be much different, due to the difference in the light wavelength (sorry im pretty sure thats not the right way of wording that, but english is my second language, and im trying my best. ) Their muscle mass would be different depending on the gravity at the planet as well. These are just a few of many things that would seperate us now and make an "Alien" unrecognizable to us humans.

So yes mate, i agree with you in the sense that at one point in time, there may have been other life forms like us, but by now, i'd imagine they would have changed.



P.S. Feel free to argue anything i've said mates, i enjoy the feedback.

Originally posted by Drone74
So yes mate, i agree with you in the sense that at one point in time, there may have been other life forms like us, but by now, i'd imagine they would have changed.

That is of course assuming that ALL such life was created at the same time... and it discounts the possibility of Earth like planets where conditions are pretty much the same as here

reply to post by zorgon


There was no "creative colouration" on that image or in any other image on that post, I just used the available images from the red, green and blue filters.

And if your image is from NASA, could you please show us where did you get it from? As I said in previously, the images of the sundial from Sol 1167 do not have the red, green and blue versions needed to create an approximate true colour image.

reply to post by ArMaP

The meaning of the words is simply"think outside the box". I was hoping you'd see the faces,especially The one in the smallest top pic where coincidentally a face overlapped on the ball of the sundial. If you could just pay attention to the ball portion of the sundial(top of sundial) in all 3 pics you'll see what face luckily was in the way and got implanted via nasa masking,where the faces are compressed against the background.