posted on Dec, 29 2002 @ 09:59 AM
Toltec,
My first post on these board's was 17-8-2002 at 11:19 PM... That was my first post within the religous forums. My next post there was on 9-11-2002 at
01:13 PM. Your first post in that thread...
"Great TC but in actuality to we accept the present interpretation, the one provided by Vatican one, or what was evident in the days' of John
(90AD). With by the way was a system of belief that accepted Reincarnation as valid. I mean is not internal life and salvation given to those and only
those who get it right? Those who pick the actual system of belief Jesus actually was trying to promote?
the question I feel is relevant at this point TC is that is my God better than yours??? "
Your second...
"For me Hell is a location where those who, because of there acts cannot face God. This because they failed to understand Gods intent, to a degree
that are themselves so ashamed, they have to turn away from him (hide). This because what they have done makes it painful to be in his presence. God
understands and makes possible such places where his attention is limited to the extent that others feel he is not present. This situation can and
does lead to nonexistence and the final death."
So, I've known since then, that you were a religous man.
Funny, from your response's in the religous forum, from before my first posting, I'm sure anyone could have guessed you were religous to a certain
degree. I don't know exactley when you 'admited to being religous. but...
"posted on 14-10-2002 at 03:02 PM
Personally I feel that God has the inherent capacity to make evolution his tool to create mankind. "
Then...
"posted on 14-10-2002 at 04:15 PM
And perhaps there is a means by which what we call a soul becomes inherent. Once a life form reaches a certain point in development. Personally I feel
that man was designed to do what they can do at present. But perhaps even that is unnecessary, history does cite there was intervention (from all
points of view). That does in fact seem the answer.
We were created."
Then,
"posted on 15-10-2002 at 08:32 PM
can respect that William but might I suggest that in today's age. A hospital bed can be modified to register the loss of weight of 1/16 of a gram or
more. In my humble opinion the results would confirm or deny the 1907 experiment so why is it this experiment has never been repeated? ......"
So, since then it has been very very very easy to see what it is you believe in. Let me remind you, this was all posted during my 2 month absence from
the forum's. You can check this if you'd like.
So, when you said "You know James you have been acting this way towards me ever scince my first Christian Identity post. What wrongs James am I
hitting to close to home?? " You were wrong. It's been known for some time now, that you are a religous person. Even since our first discussion's
together, it wasn't hard at all to see that. You act as if your singled out, your not. Everyone get's whatever treatment they deserve. You've
gotton your's accordingly. You claim thing's without posting any relevent actual physical proof that was asked for. When asked over and over to
provide such proof, you snapped. You think you've got me figured out as JTL, and this is based on your 'evidence' that we were both warned at the
same time, despite JTL not doing anything 'wrong'. That right there show's lack of knowledge of what was going on at the time we were warned. And
is hardly any evidence at all. Then, you claim I'm a child abuser, from what evidence though? You claimed it was because I have no problem's with
children gaining access to thing's (movies, games, etc...) that were not for their age level. Where you got this from is beyond me. I haven't posted
anything remotley like this, you can look that up as well. What you are doing, is playing a nasty game. All brought up from your lack of wanting to
post any relevent proof of what I asked for. This is ridiculous.