Another Fake Syria Nuke Photo?

Originally posted by Shugo
reply to post by battlestargalactica

 

If something happens to a nuclear facility, that's a big "uh oh" for the country that the facility is in, and the one that it belongs to. It's not a matter of "oh boo hoo, we lost some cool remote controls and a microwave", it's a "holy crap! We just lost billions of dollars in technology, and now our rivers are purple!"

This is the reason why they had it out in the middle of nowhere, "out in the open". The program if discovered was likely to be targeted and they were aware of this, they tried to hide the site in "plain view" while attempting to avoid any potential casualties that could arise from a hit on a nuclear facility in or anywhere near a densely populated area. Remember wind.

double post, sorry.

[edit on 4/27/2008 by Blaine91555]

Irregularities in the ground the shadows are cast on will always cause this. If they were all perfect it would be suspect. I see nothing here but someone trying to make the evidence fit the theory. The person may even think they are correct due to personal bias and wanting it to be true so much they see what they want to see instead of what is there.

Originally posted by Blaine91555
Irregularities in the ground the shadows are cast on will always cause this. If they were all perfect it would be suspect.

Thank you. Those who have claimed the photo is faked/manufactured have absolutely no business trying to interpret aerial photography, as they clearly have no experience with the subject. many people pushing this idea clearly have a specific agenda in defending Syria or slandering the USA, and have absolutely no business trying to interpret aerial photography. (The Syrian Ambassador to the US)