Originally posted by indierockalien
Teach kids that guns are good?
Absolutely. As a hammer is good for the driving of nail and the shovel for digging of soil, so too a gun, a tool, is good for the protection of
freedom and liberty. The medium I would have to question, however, growing up with Nickelodeon myself I know that I would not have understood the
principle behind such a lesson without further guidance or explanation.
Originally posted by indierockalien
What does Nickalodeon even mean? &%!% kids up and make them gun toting violent criminals-vision?
I hope that you are not implying that all who carry firearms are "gun-toting violent criminals." They may have that potential to become criminals,
but they have the potential to be heroes as well. The more of my countrymen that are trained to carry and operate a firearm and even armed with one,
the safer I feel, actually, and my only regret is not being armed myself while making them less safe. I still agree with you that Nickelodeon may not
be the best way to advertise firearms to children. At least, not with some of the programming on that channel which can drive anyone to kill. One
morning my neighbor might wake up to find an extra television in his living room as I throw mine out of the window.
Originally posted by indierockalien
I'm sorry, but guns need to be shot into the center of the sun forever.
Oh, yeah and create another
[color=786cd2]Nuclearman? You're on your own there, Superman.
Originally posted by indierockalien
and now teaching kids how to operate guns so they can fight and die in our future wars...
Foresight is great for making responsible decisions, but horrible when it comes to predicting the future. And I would not look to a son who is being
trained by his father to shoot firearms and say to myself, "Someday that kid is going to rob me," or "Someday that kid is going to die thinking he
was protecting my freedom." Wars have been fought since man first beat to death with a branch, a rock, or bone another man and wars will be fought as
long as there is a bit of resource to conflict over.
If you have the capacity to love, you will always have the capacity to hate: strength comes not from rejecting the one while embracing the other but
maintaining an equilibrium between the two and understanding what causes these emotions and when and how properly to employ them. Just as the hate
that you have employed towards war, firearms and the idea of teaching children to use them instead of philosophy to settle differences and consider
the consequences of actions. Let not hate be foreign to you lest you be ill-prepared for its effect.
Originally posted by indierockalien
At least we can rest assured knowing that little Timmy's head was blown clean off responsibly in the line of responsible patriotic all American duty
for his corrupt and drug addicted leader('s)( chess game).
And this is what the right to bear arms comes down to: if the government no longer represents the will of the people, the people have the power to
change,
with force if necessary, the government and put in place one that does represent them. That would take one hell of a movement that I
expect would be more capable and knowledgeable and just than a group of "gun toting violent criminals." It is important that children are taught the
history of our nation, the principles upon which it was founded and the necessity and sacrifice required to protect it; otherwise, they will consider
the condition upon which they are born, whether it is under freedom or oppression, to be natural as the history of a once great nation is rewritten
without resistance and thereafter remain without remembrance.