I have created a free energy plant.

reply to post by taybes


Currently in the works, It's pretty much the same as above.....


But, it's alot simpler.

But you said it dealt with vibrations and resonance?

That is not a perpetual motion machine either. Its far from "free energy". Plus that is not turning a turbine.

Plus that is commonly done in classrooms. that is not a secret thing that you and your father have been working of for years.

I came here with an open mind willing to help you. You have made this nothing more than an entertaining joke for yourself. You have wasted everybodies time and brought the overall quality of these boards down.

Originally posted by SomeGuy34
reply to post by T.Smith

 

How about you come say something like that to my face.

im not twelve and im not going to meet you on the playground, your just making yourself look infantile.

Anyways, not to be a threat, I'd just verbally annihalate you with the truth syrum

Dont worry your not a threat


If the rest of this post wasnt enough proof for anyone else in this thread that this is the work of a dillusional child begging for attention then this has to be, im not saying an 18 year old couldnt invent an amazing invention, but this clearly confused child and all his ego stroking needs has nothing of value.
Of course i am more than willing to be proved wrong and will eat my words if this machine is produced however im sure it wont come to that.

This is the same user "Prophet-Ezekiel" who had a meltdown the other day and was banned. Somehow, has managed to return as this user.

Just be patient....it'll happen again.

reply to post by SomeGuy34


UTTER TWADDLE

herons fountain is a party trick - it uses far more energy than it " produces "

you have to move the bottles manually - it is not - nor can it ever be an energy generation system

your ignorance of basic physics is simply mind blowing

reply to post by SomeGuy34



Whoa. My reply wasn't to be taken as an attack on you or your grandfather's credentials. I simply was stating that your drawing seemed familiar and, in some ways, similar to that of Schauberger's ideas on vortex energy.

I thought I would chime in again.

I've been following this thread and someguy your ego is writing checks reality won't cash.

You should bring it down a couple of notches.

The natural frequency or resonate frequency of something does not mean that the energy of the system is greater than the impulses causing the oscillation. In other words an increase in amplitude is a result of the cumulative impulses timed to increase the amplitude. The energy contained in the oscillation cannot be greater than the energy spent to get the oscillation in the first place.

Not to hijack the thread or anything, but I also had an idea on free energy, and I would like you to see what you could do with my idea. Hey, if it helps anyone you are free to use it. I hope you will be successful in your quest someguy! I think we should applaud him for even thinking of helping mankind even if his ideas seem unorthodox.

Heres my idea in a crude drawing...

I am confused about what you are asking. Do you need help evaluating your design or would you like to be pointed in the appropriate direction for further research into your ideas? A good book to read which explains the possibilities of our current science is "Physics of the Impossible:" by Michio Kaku, it will explain to you the current limitations of our science.

As for your design it seems to me any energy gain that might be experienced is correlated to Vortex Theory, which another responder posted. This science is still in its infancy, even though it has been discussed in scientific circles for two centuries.

Finally, the many various thoughts that you have posted are quite complex, maybe too much so for this individual post. I suggest focusing your ideas, giving us the minutia, rather than spraying so many broad ideas. If it all is relevant to the discussion it seems as though you could be touching on a Unified Theory type discussion, which is in itself a leviathan.

I am no physicist, but I do have a B.S. in Poly Sci. a research science in which "The Method" is constantly used. In my years (not many) I have reviewed countless journals and experiments and in every single one peer review and trial/error were the determining factors, so I would rethink keeping my ideas to myself, for fear of what seems to be happening here which is ridicule for lack of evidence.

I hope I could be of assistance.

I see a few flaws. It is not a free energy device if profit is made off the energy it produces. Instead, you should use the term alternate energy device. I am also confused by the state of this device. You claim you have already profited from it and it is still being designed? If you could clear up the state of this device that might help.

Based of what I have read here, the energy input/output efficiency does not make it sound like a good choice. Gravity manipulation? Not really a low energy topic.

If your concept is based off a body of water placed very high so potential energy is high, or runs like a hydroelectric generator that is fine. But remember something needs to place that water up there. That just destroyed the energy you produced, and then some. This is why dams are a great choice for electricity, nature places the water up there for us. There are different types of siphons, what kind are you talking about?

If you are looking for invention help, start first by patenting the design; also check to see if the design is already patented. You could be in violation of the law. (Don't assume that no one has thought of it before, we have patents of energy devices owned by oil companies, just so they do NOT get made) Otherwise if you do make something, then anyone can build it and patent it for themselves. You should also seek the advice of experts. Why not find fluid dynamics experts? Electrical engineers? I see no reason in the world to mention your current money situation when talking about an alternate energy device.

Well he has been given the help of at least one engineer for free. We communicated in private and he simply told me more of the usless information he has posted here.

He does not seem to have a fundamental understanding of simple physics and scientific process.

An example of this is he explained his device works on the PSI priciple.

Yes thats correct the pounds per square inch principle??!?!?

Also if you read through the entire thread, you will see his "idea" or invention changes several times over the course of the conversation. It goes from being a proven idea, to a theory. It goes from using resonance to gravity and back. This was obviously just for attention.

reply to post by DARKJEDIG


If I understand your drawing correctly (could you explain the magnet on the right a little more?) If you have a stationary magnet on the left and a magnet that can rotate on the right, they will come to a rest. Eventually the magnet on the right will find equal pull from both poles and stop. You would need to have the magnet on the left switch poles in the same frequency as the poles on the right. But that would not create any extra energy.

If I understood your drawing right.

Ah, I have the same dream of ridding this world of fossil fuels.
I have a very similar plan, but mine is merely a propulsion system, using basic gravity, aswell as water and gravitational pulls. This project of mine is what I call the "Hyper Drive Cell".

Hmm, I see a lot of text, pretty promises and a whole lot of mystery and misdirection here.

Frankly, I smell a troll, so in the famous words of those typically wiser than us, I'll have to say "Put up or shut up, kid". I mean really, you could say you're posting from inside of a black hole and there will be at least one segment of rubes here that will believe you and try to make the most inane theories as to why its true. some of the rest, well, lets not go there. So really, do you own legwork there buddy before you try to shill this one off on some of the more gullible of the tinfoil hat crowd.

reply to post by Shadow_Lord

Thanks for the reply. I just had the idea when I was messing about with some magnets here on my desk. I am not in any way scientifically inclined (I'm a web designer!) I just thought it might spark someone else's imagination, since a lot of the most useful inventions are simple in design.
Thanks for your input though.

[edit on 6-3-2008 by DARKJEDIG]

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but discussing something other than OP's concept is off-topic and therefore prohibited, right?

reply to post by DARKJEDIG


There is a design for a frictionless motor that is very similar to your concept, except that well it's a motor instead of a generator. I don't know if it could be converted to create energy...

After following forums on this site forever now, I finally have decided to weigh in on a topic that really interests me. Mr. Prophet (SOMEGUY), it appears that your system is nearly identical to Heron's Fountain as an above user pointed out. You have acknowledged his post, but what do you make of it? You said your system is even more simple than Heron's Fountain, but that system alone is not perpetual. I believe at this point, respectively, you are going nowhere new.

DARKJEDIG, I have always had similar thoughts using magnets when thinking of how to create a perpetual motion device. I did a little bit of quick searching and I think you'd be interested in these following links:

www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...

Work more, talk less. Instead of spending your time talking endlessly about your visions and invention, BUILD SOMETHING and apply it to some useful purpose.

Enough, I have work to do.

reply to post by DARKJEDIG


I have a magnetic wheel design as well and just don't have the time to build it right now but all my calculations seem to make sense.

Rare earth magnets can be expensive as well.