Originally posted by Gpbanker03
I am curious to see if anyone believes that this merger is some how related to the upcoming elections...
First off, welcome to ATS!
As to your question, I don't follow financial news (it tends to confuse me), but Diebold is high on everybody's radar around here, come election
time, so the natural questions should be: who's trying so hard to acquire them and what are their interests? Are they purely financial? No,
according to you, so
(places tinfoil hat firmly on head), it must be a conspiracy!
On my end, I did some regular conspiracy digging. You asked about a connection between United Technologies and the election, right? This is what I
found:
United Technologies
Wants to buy Diebold at a ridiculous price
Their lobbyist is
Charles R. Black
Charles R. Black
is John McCain's chief political advisor
is chairman of one of Washington's lobbying powerhouses,
BKSH & Associates
BKSH & Associates
is a subsidiary of
Burson-Marsteller Worldwide
Burson-Marsteller Worldwide
CEO is
Mark Penn
Mark Penn
chief strategist and pollster for Hillary Clinton
A Few Degrees of Separation From Hillary Clinton's Top
Adviser
The Anti-Lobbyist, Advised by Lobbyists
Charles Black's official bio
The whole thing is downright incestuous!
(*stalks off in mock outrage*)
Just kidding... most of us knew they got together and planned all this, or were waiting for some kind of proof.
These interconnections really put Hillary's whole,
"John McCain is so experienced" line in whole new light. I haven't had time to look
through it all, just getting all the links together wore me out. What strikes me off the bat is how they just don't care how obvious they are.
Think about it: everybody in DC knows this. They just don't tell us... and they didn't expect us to care, it seems.
[edit on 7-3-2008 by HarlemHottie]