posted on Aug, 8 2008 @ 03:36 AM
I'm heartbroken by Straus' presentation earlier this year. I think he's a great scholar on the impact of all sorts of domestic violence issues,
especially the notion of hitting kids to stop them from hitting! He has many compelling points, and is still a hero for many of us working on
domestic violence issues.
But, damn, Murray, you really didn't do your emancipatory homework on sexual expression when it comes to BDSM (Bondage-Discipline,
Dominance-Submission, Sadism-Masochism) communities, or, for that sake, the closeted kinky people who are reading USA today! In your own 2001 study,
which I presume you're basing your findings on, you report over 60% of the college population admits to some form of 'masochistic' sex. Does a
pathology exist if it is found in over half of your population?
What DOES exist is a lingering stigmatization of the eroticization of power during consensual, adult intimate exchange (i.e., BDSM sexual identity),
furthered by your, frankly, weak and ill-researched knowledge of the burgeoning body of research on kink (see, for example, Sadomadochism: Powerful
Pleasures, 2006; and Safe, Sane and Consensual, 2007). This bias has resulted in lost child custody and even assault charges amongst safe, sane,
consenting adults.
If we're really going to do anything to stop the epidemic of domestic violence, we need to be clear on our terms. Lambasting kink/BDSM should not be
part of the movement. This is an old, un-empirical conjecture indicative of unscientific, psychoanalytic thought that brought you such great hits as
"penis envy", "homosexual disturbance" and "insanity due to ejaculation outside the vagina". What millennium are we in?
The fact is that the media's summation of the February presentation--with its nexus of furthering the stigmatization of BDSM identity--has now been
broadcast across USA Today, Science Blog, AboveTopSecret, and other important avenues. This shows how little we have come in articulating safe, sane,
and consensual sex amongst adults. I can only wonder what this means for the people suffering under real domestic power inequalities; we have
obfuscated to the point of the profane.