Is Michael Jackson A Gay Pedeophile Biatch?

Well I try not to waver too much with my beliefs. I am glad you are not being so extreme anymore however with everything.

I admit few people would get excited so much, but he has always had a child like energy. Besides, I doubt anyone you know has been up on a balcony with thousands of screaming fans below him. It probably gives a big charge. I have not seen him do anything since though like this, so maybe he has learned not to get too excited. Besides, the child was not in much danger, compared to contemporary parents, as he had a death grip holding that child tight to him before showing it.

I agree Questforfire put up a valant fight. He is like a tired dog who can no longer bite. I understand its tough to admit your boy is a gay pedeophile that would get a small child drunk and molest him.. Thats a difficult thing to swallow. But mike will find other things to swallow.

[Edited on 20-2-2004 by dreamrebel]

Always so crude just when I thought there was improvement. Yes I noticed the rude pun of my name, why must you be so perverted?

I know he is innocent to me, I just wish others could see past the strange freak the tabloids show him as.

Originally posted by QuestForSafety
he said he just got excited. [Edited on 20-2-2004 by QuestForSafety]

LOL......yeah he has a habit of doing that around kids thats what gets him in trouble

[Edited on 20-2-2004 by Amuk]

But MJ is going to find out!

None of you would be arguing about this if Michael were a woman.
If a woman shares a bed with a child, it's because she's a loving, caring person who is trying to keep the child safe and comfortable.

If a man does it, he's a paedophile.

Strange world we live in.

Originally posted by �any
None of you would be arguing about this if Michael were a woman.
If a woman shares a bed with a child, it's because she's a loving, caring person who is trying to keep the child safe and comfortable.

If a man does it, he's a paedophile.

Strange world we live in.

Actually no. If a Woman were abusing young children I would be just as outraged.

[Edited on 22-2-2004 by Ocelot]

That is an EXCELLENT point about the unequalities shown in this situation. Were Michael a woman I doubt anyone would be outraged at all.

Your statement that you would be just as angry if a woman would be abusing children makes no sense. First of all there is no proof Michael abused anyone, the only reason people think he is guilty is because they jumped to a conclusion that he was since he slept with a child, only because he is male. Were he female all of this would have been avoided in the first place. How discriminatory towards males, and this is a mockery of all of the good males out there who are nurturing, caring, and not fitting into the bad roles people have in their minds for males to fit in, as being totally perverted, and useless for raising/caring for children. Not all males are like this though, and in the modern world this is starting to be realized. With the no longer discrimination against males in divorce cases, but instead giving both spouses an equal chance at custody. Since they realize both males and females are equally capable of nurturing, caring for, and raising a child.

[Edited on 22-2-2004 by QuestForSafety]

I am going to say this once more, and I want you to read it very carefully and slow, and perhaps outloud so it can sink in.


ADULTS SHOULD NOT BE SLEEPING WITH CHILDREN PERIOD.

That is an EXCELLENT point about the unequalities shown in this situation. Were Michael a woman I doubt anyone would be outraged at all.

So you are saying that say....Madonna was getting 10 year old kids drunk and sleeping with them no one would care? Dont be an idiot. It would be as big a deal if not bigger than MJ.

And I wasnt too sure of MJ gender to begain with

If a woman shares a bed with a child, it's because she's a loving, caring person who is trying to keep the child safe and comfortable.

How many women do you know out there that invite strange kids to there home give them booze and sleep with them?

Second question...... where were these women when I was a kid

Dany has made a good point, however it doesn't draw from how seriously these things should be taken. I just hope he is innocent, I hate to see this stuff happen.

First of all, he is charged with both providing alcohol to a minor, yes a sip of wine is a charge it seems, but this charge is set on a different date than when the alleged molestation charges took place, so your little theory of him getting the child drunk off a sip of wine, to sleep with him is ridiculous. Besides, that particular child he never even slept with, just in the same room.

Strange that the only child's parent to ever complain happens to be one who repeatedly makes these types of allegations, and is also repeatedly proven false in courts.

[Edited on 22-2-2004 by QuestForSafety]

He is, he is. ANyone who doesn't think that he's a homosexual pedophile is blind and stupid. I bet his hard core fans are going to deny it even after he gets convicted. He's made too many boy scouts millionaires. He has to be stopped!

Originally posted by QuestForSafety

There IS something wrong with harming children in any way this includes spanking which is sexual abuse, and there IS something wrong with sexually thinking about or being near a child.

Well, wasn't Jacko "being near a child" when he SLEPT with them?

What kind of motherbitch thinks that sleeping, but not getting sexual, with a child is fun?

I have this notion that you are Jacko himself, assmonkey-clown

-

Anyone who thinks that they know for 100% sure that he is guilty, when there is no evidence, except their own opinion that he is a wierdo are the ones who are blind, and unable to treat those different than them fairly. I mean different as in maybe has had a skin disease that makes them pale, perhaps has different views on reality, that are more innocent, and pure, rather than the paranoid and suspicious views that most gruff adults have.

Not only that but those who think they know he is 100% for sure guilty obviously operate on the INSANE belief that if one is charged, not convicted, just charged, they are obviously guilty. I mean that means if you were charged with the same offence a few times, you would be guilty. Is this fair? No, it is foolish, and were it you being accused, maybe by someone who wants revenge against you, wants money, or whatever, you would want justice, not to operate on your assumptions "guilty IF charged".

Your very dellusional if you think I am Michael Jackson...

If you read what I said it was thinking about a child sexually, or being near them, by this I mean being near a child sexually, such as touching them in improper areas, or harassing them with things like spanking. No, sleeping beside a child is not this type of thing, sleeping is an innocent activity. He has never even said he enjoys sleeping with children either, he just said some children that visit always say they want to sleep with Michael, and be in his room.

NO!

Motherbitch, he has said he enjoys sleeping with children, just not in a sexual manner.

Haha, got you assmonkey-clown-WackoJacko!

--

Your immature, and crude statements have no affect on me, they only show your own ignorance, by calling me names without even giving reasons as to why.

Now, no, he never stated he enjoyed it, he said there is nothing wrong with it, and that the children enjoy sleeping with someone they look up to so much.

The point is of course not this, even if he said he LOVES sleeping with children it would not mean anything, your just foolish for thinking so, many fathers, and mothers love to sleep with their children, many grandparents, many babysitters sleep with those they are watching over, if they get scared. A star sleeping with a child who wants to sleep with them, since they are really good friends is not wrong, it is only wrong to those who have dark, suspicious minds, as many adults do in this sad world today, as you seem to as well. It is sad that adults lose all their innocence, and really find it hard to believe caring people exist, they think only evil must be going on, but sometimes if you look closer, loving people exist, and care for children in proper, non-harmful ways.

Your OWN statement about him though, saying he enjoys it in NON SEXUAL manners, proves that it is an innocent act, the only evil behind it is that which YOU imagine.

[Edited on 22-2-2004 by QuestForSafety]

I'm betting there are thousands of women everyday who sleep with other people's kids to comfort them if they wake up in the night or whatever. In some tribal cultures the care of the children is shared through the tribe, children sleeping with different adults every night so the parents can have a break.
What if he'd fallen asleep with the kid whilst sitting on a sofa whilst watching a movie and hugging them? Plenty of female babysitters do that every night.
But no, because it's in a bedroom, it's somehow wrong. I don't get it.
Seriously I don't.
If the parents were worried that Michael was molesting their children, they wouldn't have let them stay, they just wouldn't. They obviously knew Michael and felt that their kids were safe with him.
So Michael's a big kid and likes having sleepovers, so what? That's not proof that he's a child molestor. Just because you think it's a bit weird, that's not hard evidence, and I'm glad that you're not on the jury if you can't think objectively about it.
The only source any of you have for this story is the media, and the media is run and written by people with agendas. you're all so quick to disbelieve it when it reports on things like war and space, but when it comes to this, you all jump on the bandwagon.
Strange, to say the least.
You know what? I can see the appeal in wanting to spend time with kids more than adults.
Kids don't want to drag you down all the time, kids know how to be themselves, kids run around and play and have fun, kids are in general, happy, kids more often than not want only love and attention from you...
I don't think it's weird to spend time with kids, Hell, we were ALL kids once, before we grew up and got boring.

[Edited on 22-2-2004 by �any]

[Edited on 22-2-2004 by �any]