It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Then you don't have a flight path? Okay, never mind.
CIT's flight path can't be impossible because we never had one
And we still don't.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT
Does this version show a realistic flight path? If not, it will be considered bunk. Thanks.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by beachnut
The winds on 9/11 would mean that if they had the C-130 take the "Camp Springs One" departure they would be having him vector right into traffic at Reagan National.
The "Morningside One" standard departure makes infinite more sense AND fits the comments of the C-130 pilot better since he says: "we traveled NORTH and west which took us by the south side of the Mall."
This is nothing like the fake C-130 flight path in the fraudulent 84 RADES data.
[edit on 19-4-2008 by Craig Ranke CIT]
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by beachnut
Your numbers are wrong but nice try!
That path fits perfectly with all the witnesses.
Boger and Walter reported the bank.
If the plane banked AT ALL it proves the official story false.
The speeds reported in the FDR have nothing to do with the north of the citgo flight path.
Your numbers are wrong but nice try!
Paik said level. Level wings means no turn.
That path fits perfectly with all the witnesses.
Boger and Walter reported the bank.
If the plane banked AT ALL it proves the official story false.
So you make them up?
The speeds reported in the FDR have nothing to do with the north of the citgo flight path.
Your sentences are still very awkward but I am getting used to interpreting them.
Originally posted by beachnut
The WINDS? Do not bs a pilot, both departures are good for 9/11 winds, you do not understand flying. Did you even read the departure instuctions. The C-130 was not going north! He was going home.
The winds on 9/11 were coming from the north so planes were approaching from the south which would make it extremely unlikely that ATC would direct traffic out of Andrews right into that approach corridor.
Do you feel good that you have me now? LOL
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
[Yes beachnut.
The direction of the wind determines which direction the planes approach and depart Reagan.
You didn't know this?
Planes land into the winds and depart with the winds.
The winds on 9/11 were coming from the north so planes were approaching from the south which would make it extremely unlikely that ATC would direct traffic out of Andrews right into that approach corridor.