It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whatukno
These are the great hallmarks of our nations military. These principals are what every soldier, every marine, every airmen, and every seamen hold dear into their hearts.
Originally posted by whatukno
This is what makes our military strong and gives each and every person in the military the will to do what is right.
Originally posted by whatukno
They fight they die for our freedoms. It is because of their service and their pride and honor that no coup would ever succeed. That coup in and of it self would be a domestic enemy that each and every serviceman vowed to defend against.
Originally posted by whatukno
The way our government is structured no one individual holds enough sway over our military to perpetrate any sort of coup. The president may lead our nations military but it is congress that drives it.
Originally posted by whatukno
I am going to have to respectfully disagree with you on this being a simple blanket statement. These are core values in our nations military.
Originally posted by whatukno
In the scenario where you state that the joint chiefs of staff eliminate the executive branch and hold hostage the legislative branch what you would find is a group of power hungry men vying for the position of authority.
Originally posted by whatukno
Also your scenario would depend on our civilian government being so wayward from the constitution that a violent overthrow of our government and a reestablishment of core constitutional values would have to be implemented to regain our American way of life that each and every US citizen holds dear.
Originally posted by whatukno
It is these checks and balances that would prevent and eliminate the need and the desire for a military coup of our government.
Originally posted by whatukno
The scenario also would have to take into account that the American people become so complacent and so cowed by the system that they become apathetic to our government becoming so tyrannical that we would have no other choice than to coup our own government to replace it with one that the American people would stand behind.
Originally posted by whatukno
This is the reason our founding fathers fought so bravely in the first place to overthrow the tyrannical British Empire and to develop a system of government that they felt would be able to adapt and change to fit the majority of the people by the people and for the people.
Originally posted by whatukno
A coup would be a deathblow to the military industrial complex. We live in a free society. The military industrial complex is also made up of civilian contractors that supply our government and military with the arms and other equipment necessary for our war machine to continue at a good profit to them and their shareholders.
Originally posted by whatukno
This scenario and our nations military are also made up of American citizens. These people hold our American way of life in such high regard that they chose to fight for it.
To me it’s all about the training the individual soldier receives, they are trained to follow orders and the chain of command. They are also being trained in urban combat tactics to control civilian populations on the pretext it’s for battles or wars in other countries, but could easily be used right here.
Q1. What happens if the Civilian Government is labeled incompetent, or unfit for duty, who the soldiers will side with?
I don’t believe right now we have a General with enough charisma to be a threat, but what happens when another general like Patton, MacArthur, or Lee rises to power, and conflicts with the civilian authority. Remember we are engaged in a War on Terrorism, a perpetual war, one without end. We live in a fear society and the beginning of any coup could very well be played out in the MSM, before any physical action takes place.
History has shown that checks and balances can be eroded in time, it is happening right now in America.
Our society has changed dramatically in the wake of September 11, Whether or not that event was a wag the dog event or a legitimate attack on our country has no bearing on this debate.
How many unprecedented things has this current administration achieved, mostly in the area of the War on Terror,
only in the cases of foreign nationals held out of this country where the right of Habeas Corpus does not apply.
Habeas Corpus suspended
All are being held according to the Geneva convention of warfare, These are enemy combatants and according to the articles of the convention they may not be released until the cessation of hostilities have been concluded.
holding people indefinitely
Being currently debated as what is classified as torture I may not agree with what is considered torture but this in and of itself is a debatable point., and not applicable here in this debate.
torture
Not applicable in this debate.
Executive Privilege
I do apologize but I am not familiar with this term. Please explain this to me so that I might understand.
Posse Cometatus
This would not be a coup. In this eventuality that congress gets finally fed up with the executive branch there is a system in place that would allow them to remove a sitting president without the need for a coup. It is called an impeachment. It has been done before and is capable of happening again.
how long till it will be up to the military to just step in to make sure we have a safe and secure country and who ever said that the courts, and congress would not support a possible coup.
Q2. The first American civil war claimed one million lives, and saw our navy go from 90th place in the world to 3rd in the world, millions where made by the manufacture of weapons, do you think a new civil war here would be any different?
Originally posted by whatukno
Most likely the soldiers will side with the government, however the police would most likely side with the citizenry.
Originally posted by whatukno
We have lived in this society for quite a while now. It was just like this during the cold war. We lived in perpetual fear of commies during the cold war and no coup ever took place. A fear society is a great thing for the MIC, it allows them to develop and spend money on arms. This keeps the MIC happy and content. This in and of itself decreases the already minimal chance of a military coup.
Originally posted by whatukno
I’m glad you brought this up; this would be just another scenario of what could happen. The civilian government could be labeled as a threat to our constitution/republic form of government, and the military could step in with the pretext of restoring our constitutional form of government.
In the event that the military would rise up against a government that has been deemed a threat to our constitution this would be a revolution not a coup. To restore the constitutionally elected government, by the people and for the people would simply be a revolution. This massively differs from a military coup.
With the militarization of our police force in the last decade or so, it’s sometimes hard to tell the difference from the military and the police. Our police are engaged in a war of there own, a war on drugs, so what does that make the general population? It makes them potential enemies, and what does it make the police? It makes them soldiers.
The topic at hand is about a possible coup against the government in the future, not a revolution.
Sorry but you just confirmed everything I have been talking about, this is a coup plain and simple, whether there pretext is truthful or not. I will explain and reply to your questions about revolution below.
Nice debate, both members handled themselves well and both made a good case. Makes it hard to judge but I think that whatukno had the staying power and closed better.
It was close, but at the end I didn't feel like I had been given a clear picture of any political trend in the military that represented a compelling danger. On that note I was a little disappointed not to hear more about certain generals who have warned that such a danger existed.
Both did a good job, but a critical piece of the affirmative case seemed very understated, and that made the difference.