It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EclipseReloaded
...Recovery of craft with paper thin indestructible metal debris...
Originally posted by EclipseReloaded
Individual parts, the aluminum foil-like metal that covered a mile wide debris field ...
Originally posted by adigregorio
Originally posted by EclipseReloaded
Individual parts, the aluminum foil-like metal that covered a mile wide debris field ...
I see, so to layman this a bit. It would be like finding "cogs" or "switches" that were indestructible. Not, for instance, the "shell" or "outer layer" of a craft.
If this is your meaning then I understand now. If not, and you mean the latter of my idea can you please elaborate how the "shell" or "outer layer" could be destroyed in an impact.
Furthermore, to keep on topic somewhat. I honestly believe if there was anything of consequence to disclose it would have been done already. Not all governments are as dense as the good ol' United States. Of course neither do I belong to these "other" governments, nor am I a citizen so I could be mistaken.
Originally posted by EclipseReloaded
...World governments coverup what they do have to prevent mass hysteria with the accompanying breakdown of financial and religious institutions. The world as we know it, would be in a new, volatile era...Everything would change, probably for the worse for a long time...
Originally posted by EclipseReloaded
Indestructible as in substantial forces, like incredible speeds, propulsion systems colliding with terra firma being the only way to break said parts of a whole. Those kind of forces might could break an unbreakable comb. Maybe defense contractors should make jets out of those combs instead.
Originally posted by EclipseReloaded
As far as your "I just like to pursue all available options before deciding on which is right for me." That implies that I don't.
Originally posted by EclipseReloaded
My point is that the "all available options" are limited by...the powers that be. They pull the strings on "the more people" than government officials.
Originally posted by EclipseReloaded
I feel like I've made myself clear and you might want to argue for the sake of arguing.