It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Hunter, originally known as JIMPACS (Joint Improved Multimission Payload Aerial Surveillance, Combat Survivable), was based on the Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) Impact UAV. TRW provided systems integration and management of the Hunter in the USA. In March 1991, the evaluation of Sky Owl and Hunter began. The tests included "relay flights", in which one vehicle would relay the signals between the ground and another vehicle, which was flying the actual mission. In June 1992, the Hunter was declared the winner of the UAV-SR competition, and in February 1993, TRW received a contract for seven complete Hunter systems, with an average of eight vehicles per system. None of the reserved PQM-149 and PQM-150 designations was used, however, and Hunter became the BQM-155A instead.
In 1999, some Hunters were taken out of storage for operational use in the operation in the Kosovo. At that time, the BQM-155A was redesignated as RQ-5A (in the new Q-for-UAV series in the designation system for manned aircraft), and several RQ-5As were equipped with a laser designator. The remaining Hunter systems of the U.S. Army were used for test and evaluation purposes, and were planned to be retired when the new RQ-7 Shadow 200 became available. However, initial delays in the RQ-7 program and later the growing importance of UAVs have lead to a marked increase of the Army's use of their RQ-5A systems.
Beginning in January 2003, Northrop Grumman developed a repackaged version of their BAT (Brilliant Anti-Tank) guided anti-armour submunition, which can be deployed by suitably modified Hunters. The first modified BATs and Hunters were delivered to the U.S. Army in March 2003, and in April 2005 the designation MQ-5A was allocated to RQ-5As modified for weapons delivery.
In 2003, Northrop Grumman purchased the Hunter program from TRW. Subsequently, the company developed the MQ-5B, a Hunter variant which has been further optimized for the multi-mission role. It first flew in July 2005. The MQ-5B has a longer center-wing section, increasing the span by about 1.5 m (5 ft). This ensures proper clearance of the landing gear when dropping the BAT weapon. Additionally, the longer wing provides for a higher ceiling, and holds more fuel for increased endurance. The MQ-5B is also fitted with improved avionics and Mercedes Benz heavy-fuel engines. The U.S. Army has ordered 18 MQ-5B aircraft, which are expected to remain in service until at least 2009.
Solicitation Number:
W58RGZ08C0025GREENDART
Notice Type:
Presolicitation
Synopsis:
Added: February 11, 2008
The US Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) located at Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama has an urgent requirement to procure on a sole source basis the on-site technical, engineering, logistics, training, and operational support to Operatio n Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) for the Green Dart Payload effort.
These items are only available through Northrop Grumman Technical Services, Inc., 4067 Enterprise Way, Sierra Vista (Garden Canon), AZ 85635-2273. It is anticipated the award will be a Cost Plus Fixed Fee modification to the current contract. All responsible sources may submit a quote to the e-mail address in this notice. All submissions must be received by 25 Feb 2008.
The proposed contract act ion is for supplies or services for which the Government intends to solicit and negotiate with only one source under authority of FAR 6.302. Interested persons may identify their interest and capability to respond to the requirement or submit proposals. T his notice of intent is not a request for competitive proposals. However, all proposals received within forty-five days (thirty days if award is issued under an existing basic ordering agreement) after date of publication of this synopsis will be consider ed by the government. A determination by the Government not to compete this proposed contract based upon responses to this notice is solely within the discretion of the government. Information received will normally be considered solely for the purpose o f determining whether to conduct a competitive procurement.