bush slips up and talks about planting bombs in wtc

youtube.com...
youtube.com...
youtube.com...

this is proof i found the best 911 conspiracies videos
and there are more if you want to see them search youtube for
9/11 Coincidences (Part ___)




[edit on 10-2-2008 by xbrendanx]

[edit on 10-2-2008 by xbrendanx]


[Mod Edit]


Posting video links

Posting video links - ALL MEMBERS PLEASE READ
* Link
* Description
* Review/Opinion


[edit on 11/2/2008 by Sauron]

reply to post by xbrendanx


Can you detail where it is in the video or what Bush says?

Originally posted by xbrendanx
bush slips up and talks about planting bombs in wtc

This has been discussed to great lengths here on the boards. 20 pages of responses, if memory serves.

Bush admits there were explosives in WTC!

Hope this helps.

 

Thanks 12m8keall2c! I have never seen that quote. Interesting discussion.

To the OP, what evidence are you bringing to the table as proof, and what is it proof of?


[edit on 11-2-2008 by Sublime620]

lol i just want to say that, after only watching the first video, its kinda funny that the guy in the court room says ladies and gentlemen, because Im pretty sure there is no one in the court room besides himself and the camera man.
just saying, thought that was funny.

i just watched all 3 videos. they do a pretty good job of summing up many of the investigations ive seen on ATS, so overall good vids!

Great post, without a doubt this WAS A SETUP. Hitler used the same fear to start the war, by burning it's own building.

MAKE SURE YOU ALL WATCH "ZIETGEST"!

video.google.ca...

Good videos. Bush and co. without a doubt acted guilty but then again he always looks guilty to me. Those beady little eyes just project buffoonery, guilt and fear. Same thing with Hillary sans the simple-mindedness. Sad that as I've come of age I see a political system so cynical and corrupt that it's ok that a supposed criminal can choose and castrate the very committee sent to investigate him. Even in a better case scenario and let's say they were indicted they would just be pardoned by the incoming el presidente in the same manner as nixon.

There have been a few other occasions where peope have "slipped up".
Like this one featuring Rumsfeld.

Rumsfeld says Flight 93 was "shot down."



[edit on 11-2-2008 by Black_Fox]

can someone explain to me, what you people are talking about?

AHhh "9-11 Bloopers" who can ever forget this one:



More to come.....I'm sure.

watchZEITGEISTnow

And another "911 Blooper" : And remember to watch the ending especially.



watchZEITGEISTnow

reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow


Where is the editor of the video getting their time frame from? I didn't see any clocks on the news channel...are they just going by what time the news broadcast comes on?

I've been wanting to use this material in my english reports, but conspiracy theory wouldn't be accepted, although I'd say that this is some factual stuff.

I would like to know what it waould take for someone whos does not think this was at the very least, some what of a inside job ???

Originally posted by preston067
I would like to know what it waould take for someone whos does not think this was at the very least, some what of a inside job ???

Oh trust me, get ready to hear the rebuttals for this. There are so many people STILL saying the gov had absolutely nothing to do with 911. I think even if Bush said he had a remote control that flew the plane into the tower people would still say, "There's no conspiracy here". LOL

Originally posted by The Universal Mind
reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow

 

Where is the editor of the video getting their time frame from? I didn't see any clocks on the news channel...are they just going by what time the news broadcast comes on?

I've been wanting to use this material in my english reports, but conspiracy theory wouldn't be accepted, although I'd say that this is some factual stuff.

Aside from clocks not being readily seen is something far more pertinent. A reporter, identified as being from BBC, keeps saying WTC 7 has collapsed, and, yet, is still obviously standing directly in back of her, while she is spending many long minutes reporting it had already collapsed. All anyone had to do, was verify the time that report starting transmitting out to the viewers of BBC news reports. Then time adjusted correctly for US EDST. That is very likely how the time was determined.

The same exact action occurred in the FOX video, we have been able to view, in at least two of the discussions as OP discussions. Only it was seconds (FOX) not many minutes later (BBC) WTC 7 started to collapse.

If people are going to report buildings collapsing, reporters should verify the buildings are indeed collapsing when reported to be collapsing.

The next more pertinent question is this. From whom did all those reporters get their blatant erroneous information to broadcast over two separate networks, one an overseas network, not US?

reply to post by xbrendanx


Excellent post xbrendanx

We are living in a very troubled time, no doubt. The reason that convincing everyone of the truth is so hard to do is because of pure fear. I have to admit, there was a time when I gave my support and 100% allegiance to Bush and Co. (you can see it in my posts made 3 years ago) But it is hard to dispute the facts. Even now, I just want to believe its not true, that there is no way that this could be an inside job. But again, you cannot dispute scientific proof nor can you dispute eyewitness testimony from people who were there at the moments these actions transpired.

One of the biggest standing points to me is this:
If somehow, by some unknown reason, the truth be, that the towers collapsed due to steel melting as a result of the fuel from the planes, then how the hell did building 7 collapse?

It was reported, and recorded by workers at ground zero, to which I personally know a few having lived in NYC at the time, that there was molten steel under the rubble of the towers. This is cataloged by every major news network and 9/11 special and is not disputed by anyone. It is said to have been molten for as many as 5 weeks after the collapse. This is explained as the result of burning fuel. (which is impossible due to the exact temperature needed and the scientific facts of individual fire temperatures in relation to what is burning)

Ok, but lets say this is a correct analysis, then tell me this:

How was there this same molten steel under the collapse at building 7 which also was reported by these same workers?

There was no fuel at all from any planes associated with building 7. It was said to have collapsed because of falling debris from the towers which weakened its structure. A falling building does not produce molten steel.

There has also been reference to building 7 being purposely brought down or "pulled". It is impossible to anyone in the field of demolition to conceive that this action could be carried out so quickly without the pre-arrangement and placement of detonators.

Lets say they were able to place these detonators so quickly and bring down building 7. That would account for the molten steel under the pile of concrete and debris.

But it still does not explain the molten steel under the towers. Obviously they were all controlled demolitions.

There is too much proof to refute. The eyewitness testimonies of firemen, policemen, and news reporters who were on the scene at the time all admit to hearing the bombs going off, the flashes can be seen, and it was all recorded on live tv. The only problem is, they were never replayed by mainstream media. The fashion in which the buildings collapsed only points to controlled demolition. They`re explanations are all contradictory.

The biggest worry with understanding the truth is then trying to understand the big plan in all of this and the fact that so much of what we blieved was never true at all. It is hard for anyone to fathom including myself. But we cannot simply just sit back and let it happen to us. I don`t believe every single politician is in on it so we must find our true representation as well as informing everyone and never stop searching for the truth.