Originally posted by Aim64C
The rubble has all been scrapped -
Nope it hasn't, there is a hangar in NY, that still has tons of steel
left over in storage as well as vehicles and many other items
collected after 9/11
Originally posted by Aim64C
so it's not like you are going to find any bomb residue
Yes, there is residue. There is sulfur residue on the molten metal
which was collected and is waiting a regime change in Washington
to go forward as we're beating our heads against the wall until
GWB leaves office. GWB and cronies would not allow it to be
admitted into evidence in the 9/11 Omission Report. This residue
is proof that Thermite was used in the demolition of the towers.
There is no other explanation for it being in the rubble of ALL 3
buildings that fell on 9/11.
Originally posted by Aim64C
or some smoking gun
I don't know what you call a smoking gun, but there were at least
100 firefighters saying there was explosives planted in the building.
Several Fire chiefs ordered their teams out of the building
until the building could be secured from the devices. They will
not testify cuz their jobs are at stake due to their superiors
threatening their pensions if they talk. But their testimonies
were still on the TV during the live coverage of the event.
Seems they all had change of hearts when their livelihood was
threatened.
The lobby was blasted out and there was no lobby floor elevator
which went up to the upper floors where the fire was, so it was
impossible for the lobby to show signs of a plane explosion when the
building was designed to seal off the elevators to prevent such
an event of an elevator dropping all the way to the lobby with a
ball of fire. In other words, you had to change elevators twice
in order to reach the top floor.
The explosion came from underneath where the elevators
connected from the parking garage. I would consider all of this type
evidence a smoking gun. But GWB seems to discard it as though
it is just ants behind the looking glass. It doesn't matter to him.
He got his war and his place in history as the man who ousted
Saddam Husein. Saddam was the man who attempted to kill his
father with an assassination attempt. The WMD was irrelevant
and so if the evidence as it conflicts with his foreign policy
objectives. Proof of bombs ALL over the building IS a smoking
gun of demolition. As no terrorists in the world could do all
that alone without help on the inside.
Originally posted by Aim64C
You are wanting to spend millions, possibly billions, of U.S. currency to conduct an investigation into an event that is six years in the past
YES, what is the cost of 2,749 American lives ?
How much did the Nuremberg Trials costs? What was the cost of
5 Million Jews ??? Was it worth it ???
Originally posted by Aim64C
So, let's go stir up the past, and keep staring at it so that we can run right into the brick wall in front of us at full-tilt.
Sounds like a nice plan.
Sorry to say... but I strongly disagree with your desired leadership values.
I disagree with you as there is no statue of limitations on murder or
conspiracy to commit murder.