posted on Sep, 26 2022 @ 03:27 PM
originally posted by: Woody510
a reply to: Potlatch
Why do you keep in digging up 20 year old threads?
The AGM-129 missile discussed at the link posted in this thread actually first flew in the mid-1980s before being cleared for service in 1990, and the
FAS webpage about the AGM-129 doesn't discuss in depth the early developmental history and testing of the AGM-129 (there is, however, detailed info on
the AGM-129's development and testing mentioned in the display plaque for an AGM-129 on display at the USAF museum in one of the photos in the gallery
for the AGM-129 at the FAS webpage). I wanted to provide info about the fact that the AGM-129 was retired in 2012, because when this thread was
written, the AGM-129 had been in service for over a decade and the USAF felt confident that the AGM-129 would have a longer service life, but the high
maintenance costs for the AGM-129 airframe were the reason the AGM-129 was phased out, similar to how the USAF chose to retire its F-117s from service
in 2008 due to the high cost of maintaining the Nighthawk's multifaceted fuselage.
I wanted to resurrect this thread because at the time it was written, the technology to make a hypersonic cruise missile work had not yet been tested
given that the X-51 was in development, and because the AGM-181 cruise missile is under development by Raytheon, although it's unclear if it is
stealthy, while new hypersonic weapons are undergoing flight testing, including a scramjet-powered cruise missile.