Moon photo anomalys' gaining momentum in Russia.

Originally posted by mike_b
Richard C. Hoagland is a known hoaxer and crazy and his claims hold no validity in the scientific community. He was fired from NASA because he threatened to disclose made up information and when NASA was sick of it, they terminated his ass.

Wow! That was a stinker, if ever there was one!! And here's one of the reasons why they 'terminated his ass'!!!

Here’s a pic of what he stresses is proof of forests on Mars! If he’s blatantly misinterpreting this image, how reliable is he? His credibility has sure taken a beating this time!


Pic taken from Hoagland's 'Enterprise Mission'

So what he contends is that the pic above clearly shows forests on the surface of Mars.
But what’s the fact? Check out the images with progressive resolution (below) and you’ll see what I mean.




South Polar Region PSP_003443_0980
Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

Do they look like trees or just cracks/fissures on the surface of Mars? But Hoagy insists they’re trees/vegetation! Now he’ll probably change his mind….or will he put another spin on it?

But hey! I saw him on the National Geographic channel yesterday. What gives? Has Hoagy improved his TRP ratings some??

Cheers!

Originally posted by mikesingh

Originally posted by mike_b
Richard C. Hoagland is a known hoaxer and crazy and his claims hold no validity in the scientific community. He was fired from NASA because he threatened to disclose made up information and when NASA was sick of it, they terminated his ass.

Wow! That was a stinker, if ever there was one!!

And here's one of the reasons why they 'terminated his ass'!!!

Here’s a pic of what he stresses is proof of forests on Mars! If he’s blatantly misinterpreting this image, how reliable is he? His credibility has sure taken a beating this time!


Pic taken from Hoagland's 'Enterprise Mission'

So what he contends is that the pic above clearly shows forests on the surface of Mars.
But what’s the fact? Check out the images with progressive resolution (below) and you’ll see what I mean.




South Polar Region PSP_003443_0980
Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

Do they look like trees or just cracks/fissures on the surface of Mars? But Hoagy insists they’re trees/vegetation! Now he’ll probably change his mind….or will he put another spin on it?

But hey! I saw him on the National Geographic channel yesterday. What gives? Has Hoagy improved his TRP ratings some??

Cheers!

Man, I really thank you for helping me prove my point here. Richard Hoagland....lord. When will people just study the facts about him instead of assuming his nonsense is true. Now, I'm not saying he's wrong on EVERYTHING he says, just what I know he has said and that I have researched the contrary to. The funny thing is though, no matter how many times he is publicly disproven, he always has some excuse for it. I'd like to know what he makes up about why he was wrong on the information Mike Singh has presented above.

I would honestly have more respect for the man if he would just admit he was wrong every now and then. It takes a big man to admit when they were wrong and Hoagland is always too proud to admit it, opting instead to further corroborate his stories with additional nonsense to prove why he ISNT wrong.

[edit on 12/1/2007 by mike_b]