posted on Nov, 20 2007 @ 12:44 PM
See for yourselves.
How silly I felt to overlook that in a den full of thieves, it's improbable that one man, even if good, could enter the fray in the highest position
and he alone overthrow the fiends. If the extent of control by a "ruling elite" over the US government is as deep rooted as the conspiracies say,
than the ratio of wicked to good political power wielders is too great to be overcome by one glorified civilian! This all can't be undone behind the
scenes by a lone force, it's too massive.
Where's the leverage to even make it possible once in position anyway? There's nothing a glorified civilian (ie. President) can do to scare these
boogeymen from their posts by his lonesome. It's absurd if you give the "ruling elite" conspiracy merit. They have infiltrated Congress, our
judicial system, and the Military in great numbers according to legend. What will EVER change without FULL disclosure to the public on just what the
hell is going on here? I seriously doubt that we could be freed from the clutches of our corporate masters in secret, and fat chance on us ever
getting the whole truth
for a tv viewing public from where we need to hear it without the righteous man being shot .. SO.. I'm starting to
believe that if Ron Paul were to win in '08, he is in fact
perfect not just the assumed kryptonite - to lead the charge in a transition to
"Fortress America" and down that terrible road to
perdition.
If it were to play out this way, the people would never see it coming. They will have been lulled back to sleep thinking old Ron will set everything
right with immigration, the war, etc. What a terrible position for the American people to be in if Paul won and this were a likely scenario! We'd be
defenseless, totally unprepared for this bait and switch.
In short, I guess I'll close with that these elite appear to have all their bases covered if this is true. A same coin choice for every one of us
that complain, plus a dark horse in the dugout if the usual left/right programming failed.
Maybe the answer to this globalism problem really is the unfavorable one people shush others from speaking on.