It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
... IF there were in fact a molten material witnessed. (Im not saying there wasn't) FACT remains this molten material was NOT analyzed to determine what the material was.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
reply to post by Copernicus
Copernicus...
Who said any steel was melted? Why do many CT'ers STILL argue this point.
One more time on the "molten steel" . IF there were in fact a molten material witnessed. (Im not saying there wasn't) FACT remains this molten material was NOT analyzed to determine what the material was.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
There is no evidence to prove that the molten material that was reported witnessed was in fact molten steel.
Originally posted by QuasiShaman
reply to post by Zeta115
Yeah, I wasn't buying it either. Like you said, its good to see both sides of an argument. I hadn't come across this theory yet.
[edit on 023030p://upSunday by QuasiShaman]
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
reply to post by scientist
Um... Well... I don't know. I wasn't there, nor were you. Are you suggesting the only material known to man that can become molten is steel?