Dan Burisch, Master Storyteller Or For Real?

I've been watching his interviews for hours now. I haven't gotten to his skeptics yet. All I can say is he is either a master storyteller, a loon, or god forbid he's telling the truth. Oh boy.

Anybody got a take on his credibility?

jats

How about he has none and Lear vouches for him and that's further proof that he has none?

He should be in jail: www.abovetopsecret.com...

And why didn't you use the search feature? There's plenty of Burisch info within this site to post upon. Jees....

Originally posted by anhinga

And why didn't you use the search feature? There's plenty of Burisch info within this site to post upon. Jees....

Leave the Moderating to us Jeez

reply to post by elevatedone


Hm. I wasn't aware telling someone to do more research was strictly the domain of the forum staff...

I see. There's a couple of things I noticed that I usually look for, such as when a person pretends like they are trying to recall a trivial detail for something that you would think is a rather important detail, such as who wrote a memo, or a significant year when some milestone was reached. I caught two of those.

How would someone rehearse such a detailed story. You would have to have many meetings to get the story straight. Either that or he has a gift for improvisation. Maybe I'm baffled by the bull#? With a gift like that, you wouldn't need any meetings at all. Just record the whole session and make copies for everyone and tell them that this is more of the story and study it.

jats

Apologies Elevatedone -- I've been getting obsessive compulsive since going through the archives of some topics, repeat threads are like a phobia or something lately, I dunno...

reply to post by jats1


How about he wrote his own script and practiced it over and over and over again?

Originally posted by anhinga

He should be in jail: www.abovetopsecret.com...

And why didn't you use the search feature? There's plenty of Burisch info within this site to post upon. Jees....

LOL, because I stated that I was just starting on him so this was therefore a bull# thread. But, thanks for the link.

Sorry, I'm new to this conspiracy stuff and thought I had heard it all, but keep getting amazed more and more every day. Even if some is bull#, the level of bull# is through the roof. And if bull#, I'm amazed at the psychology of that as well... morbid?

jats

reply to post by jats1


Sorry should that of been considered 'slamming' or 'MODing' you Jats. And welcome aboard. Yeah, the BS meter runs high around here, which is why the site is loved by many. You'll find a lot of what you've read/known either debunked, questions remain or supported!

As per Danny boy, I think he's a real piece of work. Like you mentioned, he seems to really prepare for his interviews... and w/ that thread I linked, his "forum" posts the same topics day after day from the same 3 people, then I caught that scan and thought to post it, who knows what he is, besides either a mentally unstable person or a criminal/terrorist.

reply to post by jats1


Let me introduce you to a possible motive for b.s. at this level-the old tactic of "poisoning the well". You see, many of us believe that the government pays some people that we call "disinformation agents" to spread laughably wrong information to make the UFO/9-11/conspiracy theory movement look bad. Furthermore, be advised that John Lear may well be one of these agents, after all, by his own admission, he has done numerous covert ops for the government in his past-it's in his bio.

www.thelivingmoon.com...

reply to post by mentalempire


Great points Mentalempire -- then, people spend all night believing their stories, going through endless pages, placated by their fiction.

I think it's reached a breaking point though. When Burisch's "forum" is posting 'confessions' of his supposed status, it's more then cause for alarm.

reply to post by mentalempire



It isn't, but at least be nice about it.

Originally posted by mentalempire
reply to post by jats1

 

Let me introduce you to a possible motive for b.s. at this level-the old tactic of "poisoning the well". You see, many of us believe that the government pays some people that we call "disinformation agents" to spread laughably wrong information to make the UFO/9-11/conspiracy theory movement look bad. Furthermore, be advised that John Lear may well be one of these agents, after all, by his own admission, he has done numerous covert ops for the government in his past-it's in his bio.

www.thelivingmoon.com...

Yes, I've detected that in his moon photo presentation. His identification of a shovel excavation wheel and other stuff was a huge leap, imo. Then the most amazing part of the Copernicus 3 was labeled Scrap Yard, or Bone Yard on some website I think, like they are trying to down-play the real evidence while flooding you with a bunch of bogus findings.

Uh oh, I just faux paux'ed again and went off topic

reply to post by jats1


Enh, you don't have to be ultra-anal about off-topic issues. Just don't go way, way off topic and you'll be fine.

Great point mentalempire, should I say that Burisch is either a wasted loser, begging for attention, a terrorist, begging for attention, admitting what he did on that forum of his or neither, I think that's "on topic."

I can't help but LOL at this simple thread, on a topic we've been over time and again!

Thank you mental, but this is after all my thread, so I am all powerful and abuse my power further by asking....

Are there dis-disinformants? Do some claim others are disinformants when really they are not? Recursive minds want to know.

reply to post by jats1


Yeah, "disinfo agent" is thrown around often, deserved or not. As for PROVEN incidents of disinformation? Wikipedia has some good examples. Search around on your own, it almost seems as if you can't go two feet without tripping all over it.

en.wikipedia.org...

Heres Burisch final nail in his coffin: www.ufowatchdog.com...

I think much of what Dan Burisch talks about is true. Maybe all of it. I have watched 10 or 15 hours (maybe more) of video of Dan describing his work at S-4.

All of it is interesting but I particularly like the detailed explanation of security around Groom and S-4 and how it would work from the second you deplaned.

I have heard many other details from Ron Garner who made many of the videos.

I honestly don't blame anybody who doesn't believe Dan, Bob Lazar or Billy Meiers, George Adamski, Howard Menger, Truman Betherum. There was a time when I didn't believe many of them either.

I wouldn't expect anyone whose sole acess to information is:

1. the web
2. their cellphone
3. TV

to believe any of it.

But I believe all of them and let me respectfully suggest that you might also had you walked in my shoes for the past 65 years.