posted on Oct, 27 2007 @ 03:12 PM
Interesting subject.
I know of many people who are legitimately handicap, but refuse to park in those spots. In the dead of winter, which here in Ca-na-da can be
painfully cold, they will find a non-designated spot, and walk just like everybody else. I respect that, but I do feel they are unnecessarily
punishing themselves.
Those that park in these spots, but are not handicap, are pretty slimy. They deserve to have their vehicles targeted, and this should be
investigated.
However, governing this issue can be very difficult. Working where I work, several of my clients are regularly perceived to be quite healthy.
But they are not. They do have disabilities, and they are at a severe disadvantages. Physical appearances can be deceiving at times. So, I
recommend erring on the side of caution, but at the same time defending the rights of those who deserve this preferential parking.
One such example, that leads me to be very cautious with this, is with a work policy we have. Supporting the individuals that I do, I can enter most
places at no cost to myself. The individual needs support, but it would not be justified for them to pay for my way, and considering I am at work, it
should not be a cost to myself. Anyways, as a support worker I can enter for free. Our local theater is widely recognized for practicing this
policy. However, we had received several complaints from their manager saying that our staff was severely abusing this courtesy, and using it in
their free time. What they had said was, some of the people coming through looked "normal", thus nobody should get in for free.
True, very true. They do look normal. But they do face disadvantages that you and I do not. And because their physical appearance may not indicate
it, does not mean they do not deserve the benefit of the doubt.
Tough issue.
With this one, more people get away with it than should, because I am hesitant to approach it.