Bush invades iraq to destroy artifacts of humanity???

Link

About 3 or 4 paragraphs down, it starts talking about the invasion of iraq and stuff. Im not sure if this has already been posted tho. I think this looks like a probable idea, but im not for sure that this is all 100%true. If bush really did this, I think hes just even more crazy now.

Some would argue that these are alien/reptilian artifacts and Bush wants to loot or destroy them. Not much hard evidence to back that up but an interesting idea nonetheless.

I heared something very similar to this a few years ago but the story i heared was about searching for an artifact rather than destroying them, what i heared (and you have to take my word for this i cant offer proof but that doesn't mean i tell lies either so for you debunkers safe yourself some time) what i heared was evidence was uncovered during an excavation on the Afganistan / Pakistan border during the Russian invasion that pointed towards very powerful Sumarian technology said to bring life as well as destroy it, The artifact was also part of the dreams of the Nazi party in Germany before and during the war.

you have to admit that our human history lies beneath the sands of sumaria and if somebody got wind that such a device existed it would be worth putting masses of resourses into finding it. would also explain how nazi germany got their saucers so advanced in such a short time, i would give anything to find the german saucer base in antartica.

I dont think ive ever heard of some device buried down there but i can believe it. There is so much buried under the sands over there but i think alot of it has been destroyed after all the years of fighting. This author, Zecharia Sitchin, is a researcher in the Sumerian civilization and has wrote a few books about it and talks about the origin of mankind over there. I read a little bit of his first book called the 12th Planet and it is pretty amazing so far. Id have to reccomend it for anyone who wants to learn more about Sumeria and stuff.

Just as a rule of thumb, I'd be highly suspicious of a document (be it paper, electronic, or 'other') or an argument that starts with the phrase "everybody knows...". That usually translates as "The author believes, but is too lazy to present evidence in support of...".

Besides, we already know that Bush invaded Iraq to secure the Stargate / Portal under Baghdad.

Unless he did it for the oil

Unless he did it to start Armageddon.

I think there might already be more than enough conspiracies to explain the start of the Iraq war without adding this one, particularly since it makes little practical sense.