It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by uberarcanist
Freedom of speech does not give one the right to go way over the allotted time limit. This student created the situation. He deserved to be tasered.
Originally posted by blahdiblah
People keep saying he was resisting arrest, last time i checked you have to be arrested for something before you can resist that arrest.
When they cuff you and take you before that dont they tell you why you are being arrested?
So in my view we wasn't resisting arrest. He was resisting being manhandled, kidnapped, assaulted and tortured.
Originally posted by srsen
I mean really, i would've just unloaded on those damn cops. I think if ONE person had stood against the cops then many more would have followed.
Originally posted by corusso
reply to post by Xtrozero
Is there some rule book or something?
'cause I didn't get the memo.
Originally posted by HooHaa
FREAKING AMAZING! The poor guy just asked a question and wasn't resisting arrest if being arrested is what you could call that.
Originally posted by Kacen
He was going off on a mad insane rant, but really was that against the rules?
Also anyone else notice he sounds like Dane Cook?
...sorry I felt the need to point that out for some reason.
Originally posted by uberarcanist
No one's mentioning this, but he was tasered because he wouldn't stop screaming at the top of his lungs. He was warned that continuing to scream would get him tasered and he kept on doing it.
The officers were just giving him what he wanted.